From Tea Leaves to System Maps: A Survey and Framework on Context-Aware Machine Learning Monitoring

Machine learning (ML) models in production fail when their broader systems – from data pipelines to deployment environments – deviate from training assumptions, not merely due to statistical anomalies in input data. Despite extensive work on data drift, data validation, and out-of-distribution detection, ML monitoring research remains largely model-centric while neglecting <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">contextual information</i>: auxiliary signals about the system around the model (external factors, data pipelines, downstream applications). Incorporating this context turns statistical anomalies into actionable alerts and structured root-cause analysis. Drawing on a systematic review of 94 primary studies, we identify three dimensions of contextual information for ML monitoring: the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">system</i> element concerned (natural environment or technical infrastructure); the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">aspect</i> of that element (runtime states, structural relationships, prescriptive properties); and the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">representation</i> used (formal constructs or informal formats). This forms the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Contextual System-Aspect-Representation</i> (C-SAR) framework, a descriptive model synthesizing our findings. We identify 20 recurring triplets across these dimensions and map them to the monitoring activities they support. This study provides a holistic perspective on ML monitoring: from interpreting “tea leaves” (i.e., isolated data and performance statistics) to constructing and managing “system maps” (i.e., end-to-end views that connect data, models, and operating context).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2025.3602520
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Tea Leaves to System Maps: A Survey and Framework on Context-Aware Machine Learning Monitoring

Claudia Raibulet, Joran Leest, Ilias Gerostathopoulos, Patricia Lago
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Data Management and Algorithms
article

From Tea Leaves to System Maps: A Survey and Framework on Context-Aware Machine Learning Monitoring

Claudia Raibulet, Joran Leest, Ilias Gerostathopoulos, Patricia Lago
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models in production fail when their broader systems – from data pipelines to deployment environments – deviate from training assumptions, not merely due to statistical anomalies in input data. Despite extensive work on data drift, data validation, and out-of-distribution detection, ML monitoring research remains largely model-centric while neglecting <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">contextual information</i>: auxiliary signals about the system around the model (external factors, data pipelines, downstream applications). Incorporating this context turns statistical anomalies into actionable alerts and structured root-cause analysis. Drawing on a systematic review of 94 primary studies, we identify three dimensions of contextual information for ML monitoring: the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">system</i> element concerned (natural environment or technical infrastructure); the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">aspect</i> of that element (runtime states, structural relationships, prescriptive properties); and the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">representation</i> used (formal constructs or informal formats). This forms the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Contextual System-Aspect-Representation</i> (C-SAR) framework, a descriptive model synthesizing our findings. We identify 20 recurring triplets across these dimensions and map them to the monitoring activities they support. This study provides a holistic perspective on ML monitoring: from interpreting “tea leaves” (i.e., isolated data and performance statistics) to constructing and managing “system maps” (i.e., end-to-end views that connect data, models, and operating context).

IEEE Transactions on Software EngineeringVol. 51(12)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Data Management and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.