Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis

Johannes Schulze, Andreas Sakkas, Frank Wilde, Marcel Ebeling et al.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis

Johannes Schulze, Andreas Sakkas, Frank Wilde, Marcel Ebeling, Mario Scheurer, Robin Kasper, Alexander Schramm, Tobias Daut, Thomas Lins
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 53(11)
University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.