Teletherapy Post‐COVID‐19: Comparisons With In‐Person Client Characteristics and Service Utilization in Routine Practice
In routine practice, TH and IP psychotherapy appear to facilitate access to care for slightly different client populations, are associated with similar utilization patterns, and produce similar outcomes in university counseling post-COVID-19. Clinical systems may best serve a diverse public by offering both TH and IP services. Policy-level (e.g., equitable reimbursement for TH) and administrative support are needed to facilitate continued access to both modalities.
Authors
- Wilson T. Trusty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-4653)
- Stewart E. Cooper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-7069)
- Louis G. Castonguay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4095-9091)
- Rebecca A. Janis
- Jeffrey A. Hayes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4716-1015)
- Brett E. Scofield (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-4473)
Institutions
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Valparaiso University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2025-08-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70039
- Primary Topic
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00