Do drinking occasion characteristics differ across individuals using different moderation approaches? A social practice perspective

Background: Limiting alcohol consumption is challenging as alcohol often serves as a ‘social lubricant’ in drinking practices. While individuals adopt different behavioral approaches to reduce drinking, it remains unclear how they align their drinking behaviors with moderation goals. Aim: This study utilizes a unique dataset that captures detailed information about the characteristics of drinking occasions, encompassing key theoretically-informed elements of (social) drinking practices. The aim is to investigate whether drinking occasion characteristics differ: (i) between individuals trying to moderate their drinking and those who are not; (ii) among four subtypes of drinkers using different approaches to moderation: reducing drinking occasions, consuming smaller-sized drinks, limiting the number of drinks, or employing a mixed approach, including alcohol-free drinks. Method: Data from a large British cross-sectional survey of 101,461 regular drinkers, detailing 307,175 drinking occasions, were analyzed. Participants reported on the context of these occasions and on whether, and how, they attempted to moderate their drinking. Random-intercept models examined how the probability of reporting specific occasion characteristics varied across moderation approaches, and between moderators and non-moderators. Findings: While few differences were found between moderators and non-moderators, substantial heterogeneity emerged when comparing individuals using different moderation approaches. Notably, approaches involving smaller-sized or non-alcoholic drinks were more frequently reported in social settings, suggesting that self-control approaches are particularly useful in managing social pressure. Conclusions: Different moderation approaches are associated with distinct drinking occasion characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring moderation guidance to the specific contexts in which individuals typically consume alcohol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction Research & Theory
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2025.2542773
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do drinking occasion characteristics differ across individuals using different moderation approaches? A social practice perspective

Alessandro Sasso, John Holmes, Mónica Hernández Alava, Matt Field et al.
Addiction Research & Theory
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Do drinking occasion characteristics differ across individuals using different moderation approaches? A social practice perspective

Alessandro Sasso, John Holmes, Mónica Hernández Alava, Matt Field, Petra Sylvia Meier, Karen Schelleman‐Offermans
article en

Abstract

Background: Limiting alcohol consumption is challenging as alcohol often serves as a ‘social lubricant’ in drinking practices. While individuals adopt different behavioral approaches to reduce drinking, it remains unclear how they align their drinking behaviors with moderation goals. Aim: This study utilizes a unique dataset that captures detailed information about the characteristics of drinking occasions, encompassing key theoretically-informed elements of (social) drinking practices. The aim is to investigate whether drinking occasion characteristics differ: (i) between individuals trying to moderate their drinking and those who are not; (ii) among four subtypes of drinkers using different approaches to moderation: reducing drinking occasions, consuming smaller-sized drinks, limiting the number of drinks, or employing a mixed approach, including alcohol-free drinks. Method: Data from a large British cross-sectional survey of 101,461 regular drinkers, detailing 307,175 drinking occasions, were analyzed. Participants reported on the context of these occasions and on whether, and how, they attempted to moderate their drinking. Random-intercept models examined how the probability of reporting specific occasion characteristics varied across moderation approaches, and between moderators and non-moderators. Findings: While few differences were found between moderators and non-moderators, substantial heterogeneity emerged when comparing individuals using different moderation approaches. Notably, approaches involving smaller-sized or non-alcoholic drinks were more frequently reported in social settings, suggesting that self-control approaches are particularly useful in managing social pressure. Conclusions: Different moderation approaches are associated with distinct drinking occasion characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring moderation guidance to the specific contexts in which individuals typically consume alcohol.

Addiction Research & TheoryVol. 34(1)
European Commission (BE), Maastricht University (NL), MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB), Joint Research Centre (IT), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.