Transitioning from planning to implementation: comparing collaborative governance and developmental dynamics in 4 watersheds

Abstract Collaboration is a dynamic process where regimes emerge, go dormant or extinct, only to resurface with new members, names, forms, geographic scopes, and new purposes. This paper explores the transitions collaborations make when they move from provision (e.g., problem definition, planning, policy development,) to production (e.g., implementing projects, delivering services, etc.). The paper utilizes the Collaborative Life-Cycle Framework to explore the transitions from provision to production in 31 collaborations that emerged in four watersheds in the United States—Delaware Inland Bays, Narragansett Bay, Tampa Bay, and Tillamook Bay. Our analysis found that some collaborations engaged in what we call mixed services (e.g., planning for the transition to production). While this additional stage took more time, those that did not engage in mixed services had less success in the production phase. It was also clear that some collaborations were clearly involved in “governance”, while others were focused only on provision and/or production. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications for theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Sciences
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09583-8
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transitioning from planning to implementation: comparing collaborative governance and developmental dynamics in 4 watersheds

Graham Ambrose, Mark T. Imperial
Policy Sciences
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Transitioning from planning to implementation: comparing collaborative governance and developmental dynamics in 4 watersheds

Graham Ambrose, Mark T. Imperial
article en

Abstract

Abstract Collaboration is a dynamic process where regimes emerge, go dormant or extinct, only to resurface with new members, names, forms, geographic scopes, and new purposes. This paper explores the transitions collaborations make when they move from provision (e.g., problem definition, planning, policy development,) to production (e.g., implementing projects, delivering services, etc.). The paper utilizes the Collaborative Life-Cycle Framework to explore the transitions from provision to production in 31 collaborations that emerged in four watersheds in the United States—Delaware Inland Bays, Narragansett Bay, Tampa Bay, and Tillamook Bay. Our analysis found that some collaborations engaged in what we call mixed services (e.g., planning for the transition to production). While this additional stage took more time, those that did not engage in mixed services had less success in the production phase. It was also clear that some collaborations were clearly involved in “governance”, while others were focused only on provision and/or production. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications for theory and practice.

Policy SciencesVol. 58(3)
North Carolina State University (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.