Assessing relative hazard, risk, and seasonal differences of wildlife‐aircraft collisions

Abstract Wildlife collisions with aircraft have serious safety and economic implications. Strike risk models are used to assess the probability of an adverse event between wildlife and aircraft, providing information to guide wildlife management at airports. In the strike risk model actively used across the USA, species‐specific strike risk is a product of severity and frequency. The severity component of risk, termed relative hazard score (RHS), is a composite variable that indexes the probability of aircraft damage, severe damage, and effect on flight when aircraft are struck by a species, whereas frequency is the number of strikes recorded per species. Our objectives were to update RHS values by incorporating recent strike data available for birds and mammals, update the active strike risk model, and investigate seasonal differences in bird strike risk across species. Using data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)'s National Wildlife Strike Database (NWSD) for the years 2010–2023, we calculated RHS for 132 bird species and 16 mammal species. We found that large‐bodied birds, such as the red‐tailed hawk ( Buteo jamaicensis ; risk = 1,225,479), Canada goose ( Branta canadensis ; risk = 918,744), and turkey vulture ( Cathartes aura ; risk = 552,026) continue to pose the highest nationwide risk, with species‐specific risk ranks fluctuating seasonally. Notably, our analysis highlights one facet of the dynamic nature of wildlife risk at airports, emphasizing the importance of adaptive management strategies that consider seasonal changes in strike risk. We also identify limitations in the current risk assessment model, suggesting future improvements through bias‐corrected bird surveys and telemetry data to refine our understanding of species behavior and movement patterns in airport settings. Our findings provide insights for airport wildlife biologists to prioritize management actions, reduce wildlife‐related risk, and improve aviation safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1609
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing relative hazard, risk, and seasonal differences of wildlife‐aircraft collisions

Caryn D. Ross, Bradley F. Blackwell, Michael J. Begier, Travis L. DeVault et al.
2 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
3.43
article

Assessing relative hazard, risk, and seasonal differences of wildlife‐aircraft collisions

Caryn D. Ross, Bradley F. Blackwell, Michael J. Begier, Travis L. DeVault, Mahalah Schank
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Wildlife collisions with aircraft have serious safety and economic implications. Strike risk models are used to assess the probability of an adverse event between wildlife and aircraft, providing information to guide wildlife management at airports. In the strike risk model actively used across the USA, species‐specific strike risk is a product of severity and frequency. The severity component of risk, termed relative hazard score (RHS), is a composite variable that indexes the probability of aircraft damage, severe damage, and effect on flight when aircraft are struck by a species, whereas frequency is the number of strikes recorded per species. Our objectives were to update RHS values by incorporating recent strike data available for birds and mammals, update the active strike risk model, and investigate seasonal differences in bird strike risk across species. Using data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)'s National Wildlife Strike Database (NWSD) for the years 2010–2023, we calculated RHS for 132 bird species and 16 mammal species. We found that large‐bodied birds, such as the red‐tailed hawk ( Buteo jamaicensis ; risk = 1,225,479), Canada goose ( Branta canadensis ; risk = 918,744), and turkey vulture ( Cathartes aura ; risk = 552,026) continue to pose the highest nationwide risk, with species‐specific risk ranks fluctuating seasonally. Notably, our analysis highlights one facet of the dynamic nature of wildlife risk at airports, emphasizing the importance of adaptive management strategies that consider seasonal changes in strike risk. We also identify limitations in the current risk assessment model, suggesting future improvements through bias‐corrected bird surveys and telemetry data to refine our understanding of species behavior and movement patterns in airport settings. Our findings provide insights for airport wildlife biologists to prioritize management actions, reduce wildlife‐related risk, and improve aviation safety.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(3)
University of Georgia (US), Savannah River National Laboratory (US), Life Services (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Environmental Management, National Nuclear Security Administration, Federal Aviation Administration, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, University of Georgia Research Foundation, National Wildlife Research Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.