Promoting Urban Community Gardens as “Third Places”: Lessons from Toronto and São Paulo
Urban community gardens (UCGs) have been expanding globally. Initially created to provide fresh, organic produce for low-income populations, UCGs have evolved into models of sustainable agriculture with increasing economic significance. Beyond their economic role, UCGs serve as vital social spaces and may be categorized as third places—informal gathering spaces that foster social connections and promote well-being. This study analyzes and compares the impact of UCGs as third places in Toronto and São Paulo, focusing on their contributions to social cohesion, financial resilience, environmental sustainability, cultural transmission, and mental well-being. It is a review-based study utilizing publicly available data from policy documents, the academic literature, and official websites. Although the practice of community gardening has a long-standing history, the concept of gardens as third places is relatively recent, emerging in the late 1980s. In recent decades, there has been growing interest in their association not only with aesthetic and functional benefits but also with health, well-being, and social connection. UCGs are valuable not only for food production but also for fostering social interaction, preserving cultural practices, and promoting overall well-being. Cities must develop policies that strengthen community resilience by recognizing and supporting UCGs as essential third places.
Authors
- Fatih Şekercioğlu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1249-7432)
- Ashley Brito Valentim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9485-715X)
- Carla Soraya Costa Maia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-6686)
- Guiomar Freitas Guimarães
Institutions
- Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR)
- Toronto Public Health (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Regional science and environmental economics
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/rsee2030027
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.75
Funders
- Canadian Bureau for International Education