Effect of Manual and Electronic Toothbrushes on Color Stability and Contact Profilometry of Different CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials After Immersion in Coffee for Varying Time Intervals

Aim: This study evaluated the effect of manual and electronic toothbrushes on the color stability (∆E*) and surface roughness (Ra) of four CAD/CAM ceramics after their immersion in coffee for 2 and 4 weeks. Methodology: A total of 160 specimens (Vitablocs Mark II, Ceramill Zolid zirconia, Vita Triluxe Forte, and IPS e.max CAD) were divided into four brushing subgroups (manual, sonic, oscillating–rotating, and ionic). The samples underwent daily coffee staining, thermocycling (5–55 °C), and twice-daily brushing. Color parameters (L, a, and b) were assessed and measured utilizing a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. ∆E* was calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula, and surface roughness (Ra, µm) was assessed via contact profilometry at the study’s conclusion. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests (α = 0.05). Results: Among the tested samples, IPS e.max ceramic with manual toothbrushing exhibited the highest ΔE* values after 2 and 4 weeks (∆E* = 4.424 and ∆E* = 4.802) of immersion. Moreover, Ceramill Zolid zirconia demonstrated the highest ΔE* values with ionic brushing (∆E* = 4.883 at 2 weeks; ΔE* = 4.760 at 4 weeks). Significant differences were observed among ceramics and cleaning methods, with manual/ionic brushing causing the greatest changes (p < 0.05). IPS e.max had the highest Ra with manual brushing (0.745–0.789 µm), whereas Ceramill Zolid zirconia with ionic brushing showed the highest Ra values among the electric methods (0.745–0.757 µm). Conclusions: Manual brushing induced clinically unacceptable color changes in IPS e.max CAD, whereas ionic brushing adversely affected Ceramill Zolid zirconia. All brushing methods increased surface roughness beyond acceptable limits.