Grandiose narcissism, leadership, and workplace deviance: does self-interest always breed toxicity in leadership roles?

Existing literature on leader narcissism reveals conflicting evidence due to the paradoxical nature of narcissistic traits- narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Additionally, a bipolar view of self-interest, rooted in the concept of dual behavior may help in clarifying this paradox. Therefore, the study examines how narcissistic admiration and rivalry affect leader narcissism and workplace deviance, with self-interested behavior acting as a mediating factor. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a sample of 313 responses from Prolific, an online academic platform. Grounded in self-determination theory and trait activation theory, the framework is tested through the PLS-SEM approach in the U.S. population sample. Both narcissistic traits-admiration and rivalry shape leadership narcissism, further shaping deviant behavior. Further, self-interested behavior as a mediator refines the narcissistic tendencies of individuals in leadership roles and shapes deviant behavior. sequential mediation also confirms a strong interplay between grandiose narcissistic traits and deviant outcomes through self-interesting behavior and leader narcissism. The study emphasizes that narcissistic traits and extrinsic factors shape self-centered behavior. It further concludes that narcissistic admiration and rivalry both lead individuals to embrace dark aspects of leadership characteristics that spill detrimental effects on the workplace. This contradicts the optimistic perspective of narcissism literature, especially in the case of narcissistic admiration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03301-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grandiose narcissism, leadership, and workplace deviance: does self-interest always breed toxicity in leadership roles?

Muhammad Sadiq, Khalid Mehmood, Mei Kei Leong, Haris Ali et al.
2 citations
BMC Psychology
Personality Traits and Psychology
4.61
article

Grandiose narcissism, leadership, and workplace deviance: does self-interest always breed toxicity in leadership roles?

Muhammad Sadiq, Khalid Mehmood, Mei Kei Leong, Haris Ali, Kehkashan Ishrat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Existing literature on leader narcissism reveals conflicting evidence due to the paradoxical nature of narcissistic traits- narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Additionally, a bipolar view of self-interest, rooted in the concept of dual behavior may help in clarifying this paradox. Therefore, the study examines how narcissistic admiration and rivalry affect leader narcissism and workplace deviance, with self-interested behavior acting as a mediating factor. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a sample of 313 responses from Prolific, an online academic platform. Grounded in self-determination theory and trait activation theory, the framework is tested through the PLS-SEM approach in the U.S. population sample. Both narcissistic traits-admiration and rivalry shape leadership narcissism, further shaping deviant behavior. Further, self-interested behavior as a mediator refines the narcissistic tendencies of individuals in leadership roles and shapes deviant behavior. sequential mediation also confirms a strong interplay between grandiose narcissistic traits and deviant outcomes through self-interesting behavior and leader narcissism. The study emphasizes that narcissistic traits and extrinsic factors shape self-centered behavior. It further concludes that narcissistic admiration and rivalry both lead individuals to embrace dark aspects of leadership characteristics that spill detrimental effects on the workplace. This contradicts the optimistic perspective of narcissism literature, especially in the case of narcissistic admiration.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology (PK), University of Sargodha (PK), Taylor's University (MY), Hubei Engineering University (CN), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Personality Traits and Psychology
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.