SUPERPROJECTS AND SUPERPOWERS: HOW TEAMS WITHIN TEAMS CAN ENHANCE STUDENTS INTERPERSONAL AND ENGINEERING SKILL DEVELOPMENT

Mechanical Engineering graduates are expected to emerge from their degrees competent in communication, collaboration and other transferrable skills, often learnt through engineering design projects. Authenticity of small-group projects may be limited however, due to reduced complexity of both product and inter-team interaction of educational projects as compared to industry. Four years ago, we restructured a third-year module such that three teams of four students each collaborate in a so-called superproject to deliver a functioning prototype. In the cohort of 180 students, 15 superprojects are defined, each with a different topic. Academics act as the project director for the various superprojects, representing both client and mentor roles. Additional academics are technical advisors and supervisors to respective subassembly teams. Workshop and laboratory technicians provide practical support enabling access to, and design for, advanced manufacture and testing facilities. The module leader and departmental pastoral support team act as the superproject’s HR department, providing advice and support for professional skill development and appropriate behaviours. This structure requires strong inter- and intra-team collaboration and communication, and good interpersonal skills for successful integration of subassemblies. Findings after four years of running superprojects include that the nested organisation requires higher staff input than other options, but is considered a valuable investment relative to outcomes. The structure allows more complex projects, with variable interfaces and more authentic constraints and working conditions, improving both student experience and employability. Staff development is also facilitated through the hierarchical and collective nature of supervision and assessment on the module.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2025.122
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SUPERPROJECTS AND SUPERPOWERS: HOW TEAMS WITHIN TEAMS CAN ENHANCE STUDENTS INTERPERSONAL AND ENGINEERING SKILL DEVELOPMENT

Marc Arthur Masen, Chloe Agg, Idris K. Mohammed, Richard Silversides et al.
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
article

SUPERPROJECTS AND SUPERPOWERS: HOW TEAMS WITHIN TEAMS CAN ENHANCE STUDENTS INTERPERSONAL AND ENGINEERING SKILL DEVELOPMENT

Marc Arthur Masen, Chloe Agg, Idris K. Mohammed, Richard Silversides, Chris Guyott
article en

Abstract

Mechanical Engineering graduates are expected to emerge from their degrees competent in communication, collaboration and other transferrable skills, often learnt through engineering design projects. Authenticity of small-group projects may be limited however, due to reduced complexity of both product and inter-team interaction of educational projects as compared to industry. Four years ago, we restructured a third-year module such that three teams of four students each collaborate in a so-called superproject to deliver a functioning prototype. In the cohort of 180 students, 15 superprojects are defined, each with a different topic. Academics act as the project director for the various superprojects, representing both client and mentor roles. Additional academics are technical advisors and supervisors to respective subassembly teams. Workshop and laboratory technicians provide practical support enabling access to, and design for, advanced manufacture and testing facilities. The module leader and departmental pastoral support team act as the superproject’s HR department, providing advice and support for professional skill development and appropriate behaviours. This structure requires strong inter- and intra-team collaboration and communication, and good interpersonal skills for successful integration of subassemblies. Findings after four years of running superprojects include that the nested organisation requires higher staff input than other options, but is considered a valuable investment relative to outcomes. The structure allows more complex projects, with variable interfaces and more authentic constraints and working conditions, improving both student experience and employability. Staff development is also facilitated through the hierarchical and collective nature of supervision and assessment on the module.

Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SUPERPROJECTS AND SUPERPOWERS: HOW TEAMS WITHIN TEAMS CAN ENHANCE STUDENTS INTERPERSONAL AND ENGINEERING SKILL DEVELOPMENT — Marc Arthur Masen, Chloe Agg, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS