An analysis of phonetic and phonological systems in classical Arabic and English: a contrastive study

This study conducts a contrastive analysis of the phonetic and phonological systems of Classical Arabic and English, drawing from empirical speech data of 25 native informants. Through structured recitations, spontaneous speech, and acoustic analysis using Praat software, the research examines vowel duration, consonant timing, and stress assignment patterns. Phonological interpretation is grounded in Moraic Theory, CV Tier Theory, and Optimality Theory. The findings reveal fundamental distinctions: Arabic features pharyngeals, gemination, and weight-driven stress, while English permits complex consonant clusters and stress patterns shaped by lexical and morphological cues. Historical texts, including classical Arabic poetry, contextualize the diachronic stability of Arabic stress and syllable patterns. These insights enrich cross-linguistic phonological theory and have implications for phonology pedagogy and second-language acquisition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2549514
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analysis of phonetic and phonological systems in classical Arabic and English: a contrastive study

Ahmed Abdullahi Mohamud, Abdiwali Ali Addow, Suleiman Ibrahim Omar
Cogent Education
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

An analysis of phonetic and phonological systems in classical Arabic and English: a contrastive study

Ahmed Abdullahi Mohamud, Abdiwali Ali Addow, Suleiman Ibrahim Omar
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a contrastive analysis of the phonetic and phonological systems of Classical Arabic and English, drawing from empirical speech data of 25 native informants. Through structured recitations, spontaneous speech, and acoustic analysis using Praat software, the research examines vowel duration, consonant timing, and stress assignment patterns. Phonological interpretation is grounded in Moraic Theory, CV Tier Theory, and Optimality Theory. The findings reveal fundamental distinctions: Arabic features pharyngeals, gemination, and weight-driven stress, while English permits complex consonant clusters and stress patterns shaped by lexical and morphological cues. Historical texts, including classical Arabic poetry, contextualize the diachronic stability of Arabic stress and syllable patterns. These insights enrich cross-linguistic phonological theory and have implications for phonology pedagogy and second-language acquisition.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
Somali National University (SO), SIMAD University (SO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An analysis of phonetic and phonological systems in classical Arabic and English: a contrastive study — Ahmed Abdullahi Mohamud, Abdiwali Ali Addow, et al. · Cogent Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS