When activists and courts take on Goliath: LGBTQ+ rights and democracy in Costa Rica

Costa Rica’s legalization of same-sex marriage epitomizes a modern-day David versus Goliath struggle. Despite its celebrated democratic traditions, LGBTQ+ individuals have long been marginalized by entrenched cultural conservatism and institutional bias. The 2020 legalization of same-gender marriage, following the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Advisory Opinion OC-24/17, marked a pivotal victory. Yet, this milestone also exposed the paradox of a democracy where legal recognition coexists with deep societal resistance. This article explores how coalitions of activists, legal institutions, and international actors contested systemic oppression to achieve incremental progress. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with LGBTQ+ activists and case-law studies, it highlights the role of the judiciary as a critical tool for upholding minority rights. Legal gains offer crucial advances but also expose the law’s limits in addressing societal rejection, highlighting the need for coalitional activism. The Costa Rican experience demonstrates the role of coalition-based solidarity in upholding human rights, ensuring that the foundation of democracy rests not on popularity or power but on humanity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Review
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2025.2551228
Primary Topic
Cuban History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When activists and courts take on Goliath: LGBTQ+ rights and democracy in Costa Rica

Gloriana Rodríguez Álvarez
Peace Review
Cuban History and Society
article

When activists and courts take on Goliath: LGBTQ+ rights and democracy in Costa Rica

Gloriana Rodríguez Álvarez
article en

Abstract

Costa Rica’s legalization of same-sex marriage epitomizes a modern-day David versus Goliath struggle. Despite its celebrated democratic traditions, LGBTQ+ individuals have long been marginalized by entrenched cultural conservatism and institutional bias. The 2020 legalization of same-gender marriage, following the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Advisory Opinion OC-24/17, marked a pivotal victory. Yet, this milestone also exposed the paradox of a democracy where legal recognition coexists with deep societal resistance. This article explores how coalitions of activists, legal institutions, and international actors contested systemic oppression to achieve incremental progress. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with LGBTQ+ activists and case-law studies, it highlights the role of the judiciary as a critical tool for upholding minority rights. Legal gains offer crucial advances but also expose the law’s limits in addressing societal rejection, highlighting the need for coalitional activism. The Costa Rican experience demonstrates the role of coalition-based solidarity in upholding human rights, ensuring that the foundation of democracy rests not on popularity or power but on humanity.

Peace ReviewVol. 37(2)
Twitter (United States) (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cuban History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.