A service evaluation on referrals to an adult community learning disability team

This service evaluation investigated frequency of referrals to an adult community learning disability team (CLDT), aiming to identify patterns and outcomes. Data from 118 referrals were analysed with descriptive statistics, providing information on demographics, stages of referral process, and service offered. Strengths within the referral process were referrals being discussed within one week of receipt, and comprehensive health support being offered by the CLDT in multiple areas. The following areas were indicated as requiring improvement: reducing time from date of referral to initial contact from the service, improving effective communication with referrers, and ensuring holistic care through multiple suitable professionals. Easy to read summary ■ This report looked at the work of an adult community learning disability team in the North-West of England. It checked who was referred, why they were referred, and what support they received from the learning disability team. ■ Most referrals came from larger towns, there were more men than women, and a wide spread of different ages. ■ Most people who were accepted got support from one or two healthcare workers, not the full team. Some people waited longer than they should have to be seen by the team. ■ This work is important because it helps the learning disability team understand what is working well and where it can improve, to make sure people with learning disabilities get the right support when they need it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2025.23.2.65
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A service evaluation on referrals to an adult community learning disability team

Faye Banks, Kamran Baqai
1 links
FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

A service evaluation on referrals to an adult community learning disability team

Faye Banks, Kamran Baqai
article en

Abstract

This service evaluation investigated frequency of referrals to an adult community learning disability team (CLDT), aiming to identify patterns and outcomes. Data from 118 referrals were analysed with descriptive statistics, providing information on demographics, stages of referral process, and service offered. Strengths within the referral process were referrals being discussed within one week of receipt, and comprehensive health support being offered by the CLDT in multiple areas. The following areas were indicated as requiring improvement: reducing time from date of referral to initial contact from the service, improving effective communication with referrers, and ensuring holistic care through multiple suitable professionals. Easy to read summary ■ This report looked at the work of an adult community learning disability team in the North-West of England. It checked who was referred, why they were referred, and what support they received from the learning disability team. ■ Most referrals came from larger towns, there were more men than women, and a wide spread of different ages. ■ Most people who were accepted got support from one or two healthcare workers, not the full team. Some people waited longer than they should have to be seen by the team. ■ This work is important because it helps the learning disability team understand what is working well and where it can improve, to make sure people with learning disabilities get the right support when they need it.

FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 23(2)
Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.