Rethinking assessment and diagnosis: Are we missing cultural nuances in Learning Disabilities (LD) services?

Assessing learning disabilities (LD) requires a comprehensive, multi-method approach that considers cognitive abilities, adaptive functioning, and developmental history. However, current psychological assessment tools and diagnostic frameworks may not fully account for cultural nuances, particularly within diverse communities such as the large South Asian population I serve on my current placement. This reflective article explores how standardised assessments might fail to capture the lived experiences of culturally diverse individuals, leading to misdiagnoses or overlooked needs. I reflect on my experiences as a South Asian trainee clinical psychologist in the UK and examine potential biases in current diagnostic models. Finally, I propose culturally adapted approaches to LD assessment, emphasising the need for a paradigm shift towards inclusive and contextually relevant evaluations. Easy to read summary ■ Tests used to check for learning disabilities might not work the same for people from different cultures. This can lead to people being wrongly diagnosed or missing out on help. ■ What it means to ‘live well’ or ‘do everyday things’ can be different in each culture. Many tests are made for Western countries, so they may not fit everyone. ■ Some people face problems like not speaking the same language, having less school education, or feeling shame because of their culture. These things can affect test results and stop people getting the right support. ■ We need better ways to check for learning disabilities that work for all cultures. This can include using stories, flexible testing, and asking local communities what matters to them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2025.23.2.5
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking assessment and diagnosis: Are we missing cultural nuances in Learning Disabilities (LD) services?

Priti Surendran
1 links
FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Rethinking assessment and diagnosis: Are we missing cultural nuances in Learning Disabilities (LD) services?

Priti Surendran
article en

Abstract

Assessing learning disabilities (LD) requires a comprehensive, multi-method approach that considers cognitive abilities, adaptive functioning, and developmental history. However, current psychological assessment tools and diagnostic frameworks may not fully account for cultural nuances, particularly within diverse communities such as the large South Asian population I serve on my current placement. This reflective article explores how standardised assessments might fail to capture the lived experiences of culturally diverse individuals, leading to misdiagnoses or overlooked needs. I reflect on my experiences as a South Asian trainee clinical psychologist in the UK and examine potential biases in current diagnostic models. Finally, I propose culturally adapted approaches to LD assessment, emphasising the need for a paradigm shift towards inclusive and contextually relevant evaluations. Easy to read summary ■ Tests used to check for learning disabilities might not work the same for people from different cultures. This can lead to people being wrongly diagnosed or missing out on help. ■ What it means to ‘live well’ or ‘do everyday things’ can be different in each culture. Many tests are made for Western countries, so they may not fit everyone. ■ Some people face problems like not speaking the same language, having less school education, or feeling shame because of their culture. These things can affect test results and stop people getting the right support. ■ We need better ways to check for learning disabilities that work for all cultures. This can include using stories, flexible testing, and asking local communities what matters to them.

FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 23(2)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking assessment and diagnosis: Are we missing cultural nuances in Learning Disabilities (LD) services? — Priti Surendran · FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS