Rethinking assessment and diagnosis: Are we missing cultural nuances in Learning Disabilities (LD) services?
Assessing learning disabilities (LD) requires a comprehensive, multi-method approach that considers cognitive abilities, adaptive functioning, and developmental history. However, current psychological assessment tools and diagnostic frameworks may not fully account for cultural nuances, particularly within diverse communities such as the large South Asian population I serve on my current placement. This reflective article explores how standardised assessments might fail to capture the lived experiences of culturally diverse individuals, leading to misdiagnoses or overlooked needs. I reflect on my experiences as a South Asian trainee clinical psychologist in the UK and examine potential biases in current diagnostic models. Finally, I propose culturally adapted approaches to LD assessment, emphasising the need for a paradigm shift towards inclusive and contextually relevant evaluations. Easy to read summary ■ Tests used to check for learning disabilities might not work the same for people from different cultures. This can lead to people being wrongly diagnosed or missing out on help. ■ What it means to ‘live well’ or ‘do everyday things’ can be different in each culture. Many tests are made for Western countries, so they may not fit everyone. ■ Some people face problems like not speaking the same language, having less school education, or feeling shame because of their culture. These things can affect test results and stop people getting the right support. ■ We need better ways to check for learning disabilities that work for all cultures. This can include using stories, flexible testing, and asking local communities what matters to them.
Authors
- Priti Surendran
Institutions
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2025.23.2.5
- Primary Topic
- Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00