Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockades for potentially resectable gastric cancer: A retrospective study

The efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer (GC) are uncertain. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable GC. We retrospectively collected clinical data from patients with potentially resectable GC who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by gastrectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2021 to 2023. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the differences in pathological tumor response (tumor regression grade, TRG) between neoadjuvant programmed cell death-(ligand)1 [PD-(L)1] blockade plus chemotherapy [neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) group] and chemotherapy alone (neoadjuvant chemotherapy group). Event-free survival (EFS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also observed. A total of 220 patients were retrospectively included in the analysis, among whom 96 (43.6%) received PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 124 (56.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (21 of 96, 21.9% vs. 9 of 124, 7.2%, <i>P</i> = .004) and TRG0/1 rate (36 of 96, 37.5% vs. 22 of 124, 17.7%, <i>P</i> = .001) were detected in the neoadjuvant IO group. By the last follow-up, the median EFS time had not been reached in the two groups. The combined regimen of PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy was well-tolerated. In patients with potentially resectable GC, neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy resulted in higher pCR rates than did neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. However, the difference in EFS rates was not statistically significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2550096
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockades for potentially resectable gastric cancer: A retrospective study

Xuchen Zhang, Yunqing Chen, Helei Hou, Haitao Jiang et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockades for potentially resectable gastric cancer: A retrospective study

Xuchen Zhang, Yunqing Chen, Helei Hou, Haitao Jiang, Chuantao Zhang, Yulong Tian, Huiyun Wang, Xiao‐Chun Huang, Shanai Song, Man Jiang, Jinfeng Zhan, Ning Liu
article en

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer (GC) are uncertain. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable GC. We retrospectively collected clinical data from patients with potentially resectable GC who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by gastrectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2021 to 2023. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the differences in pathological tumor response (tumor regression grade, TRG) between neoadjuvant programmed cell death-(ligand)1 [PD-(L)1] blockade plus chemotherapy [neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) group] and chemotherapy alone (neoadjuvant chemotherapy group). Event-free survival (EFS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also observed. A total of 220 patients were retrospectively included in the analysis, among whom 96 (43.6%) received PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 124 (56.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (21 of 96, 21.9% vs. 9 of 124, 7.2%, <i>P</i> = .004) and TRG0/1 rate (36 of 96, 37.5% vs. 22 of 124, 17.7%, <i>P</i> = .001) were detected in the neoadjuvant IO group. By the last follow-up, the median EFS time had not been reached in the two groups. The combined regimen of PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy was well-tolerated. In patients with potentially resectable GC, neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy resulted in higher pCR rates than did neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. However, the difference in EFS rates was not statistically significant.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 21(1)
Qingdao University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, Wu Jieping Medical Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.