Exploring the Current Status of the Development of Desert Change Monitoring Methods

The increasingly serious desertification phenomenon poses a severe challenge to the ecological environment, and it is urgent to strengthen the monitoring of its dynamic changes. This paper aims to summarize the current status of several desert change monitoring methods and compare and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of several monitoring methods. This paper concludes that traditional digital mapping has high accuracy, but there are still limitations in terms of safety, scale, and other related issues. The coherence analysis technology like SAR is susceptible to subtle changes in the desert and is often used as an important means for qualitative analysis of desert changes, but there are technical bottlenecks in terms of quantitative parameters. In addition, due to the limitations in monitoring range and accuracy, traditional methods are currently mainly used as basic and auxiliary means. The current remote sensing monitoring methods have made progress in accuracy and scope, but still need to be combined with multiple monitoring methods to complete a complete qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/aq60j571
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Current Status of the Development of Desert Change Monitoring Methods

You-jeong Hong
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Regional Development and Environment
article

Exploring the Current Status of the Development of Desert Change Monitoring Methods

You-jeong Hong
article en

Abstract

The increasingly serious desertification phenomenon poses a severe challenge to the ecological environment, and it is urgent to strengthen the monitoring of its dynamic changes. This paper aims to summarize the current status of several desert change monitoring methods and compare and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of several monitoring methods. This paper concludes that traditional digital mapping has high accuracy, but there are still limitations in terms of safety, scale, and other related issues. The coherence analysis technology like SAR is susceptible to subtle changes in the desert and is often used as an important means for qualitative analysis of desert changes, but there are technical bottlenecks in terms of quantitative parameters. In addition, due to the limitations in monitoring range and accuracy, traditional methods are currently mainly used as basic and auxiliary means. The current remote sensing monitoring methods have made progress in accuracy and scope, but still need to be combined with multiple monitoring methods to complete a complete qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental ProtectionVol. 1(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Regional Development and Environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Current Status of the Development of Desert Change Monitoring Methods — You-jeong Hong · Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS