Water-Use Efficiency for Post-Weaning Growth Performance of South African Beef Cattle Under Intensive Production Systems

This study determined the water-use efficiency for post-weaning growth performance of beef cattle of different frame sizes under intensive production systems. A total of 33 beef cattle weaners of three different frame sizes (small, medium, and large) were randomly allocated individually to metabolic pens. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. The water intake (WI), feed intake (FI), and weight were measured across different feeding phases (starter, grower, and finisher). Water consumption (WC) average daily gain (ADG), weight gain (WG), water intake efficiency (WIE), water footprint per animal (WFP/AU), and WFP/kg were computed. General Linear Model of Statical Analysis software (SAS) version 9.4 was used to analyse the data, and the means were separated using Fisher's LSD test. The results showed that large-frame beef cattle had significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) WT<sub>f</sub>. (412.73 ± 27.27 kg) and WI (3394.09 ± 156.3 L), but also the largest WFP/AU (4407 ± 197.22 L). The medium-frame cattle achieved the highest ADG (1.48 ± 0.14 kg/day) and a moderate WIE (20.15 ± 2.18 L/kg gain), indicating an optimal trade-off between productivity and water use. The small-frame beef cattle exhibited the best WCE (0.051 ± 0.005 kg/L) and the lowest WFP/AU (3822 ± 197.22 L), highlighting superior water-use adaptability. Pearson's correlation revealed that WCE was positively associated with ADG (r = 0.499; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and negatively with WIE (r = -0.987; <i>p</i> < 0.05). These findings suggest that medium-frame beef cattle provided a balanced compromise between growth performance and resource efficiency, making them more suitable for sustainable production in water-limited environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172505
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water-Use Efficiency for Post-Weaning Growth Performance of South African Beef Cattle Under Intensive Production Systems

Ayanda M. Ngxumeshe, Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, Takalani Judas Mpofu, Bohani Mtileni et al.
Animals
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Water-Use Efficiency for Post-Weaning Growth Performance of South African Beef Cattle Under Intensive Production Systems

Ayanda M. Ngxumeshe, Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, Takalani Judas Mpofu, Bohani Mtileni, M.M. Ratsaka
article en

Abstract

This study determined the water-use efficiency for post-weaning growth performance of beef cattle of different frame sizes under intensive production systems. A total of 33 beef cattle weaners of three different frame sizes (small, medium, and large) were randomly allocated individually to metabolic pens. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. The water intake (WI), feed intake (FI), and weight were measured across different feeding phases (starter, grower, and finisher). Water consumption (WC) average daily gain (ADG), weight gain (WG), water intake efficiency (WIE), water footprint per animal (WFP/AU), and WFP/kg were computed. General Linear Model of Statical Analysis software (SAS) version 9.4 was used to analyse the data, and the means were separated using Fisher's LSD test. The results showed that large-frame beef cattle had significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) WT<sub>f</sub>. (412.73 ± 27.27 kg) and WI (3394.09 ± 156.3 L), but also the largest WFP/AU (4407 ± 197.22 L). The medium-frame cattle achieved the highest ADG (1.48 ± 0.14 kg/day) and a moderate WIE (20.15 ± 2.18 L/kg gain), indicating an optimal trade-off between productivity and water use. The small-frame beef cattle exhibited the best WCE (0.051 ± 0.005 kg/L) and the lowest WFP/AU (3822 ± 197.22 L), highlighting superior water-use adaptability. Pearson's correlation revealed that WCE was positively associated with ADG (r = 0.499; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and negatively with WIE (r = -0.987; <i>p</i> < 0.05). These findings suggest that medium-frame beef cattle provided a balanced compromise between growth performance and resource efficiency, making them more suitable for sustainable production in water-limited environments.

AnimalsVol. 15(17)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Water Research Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.