Consumer Characterization of Commercial Gluten-Free Crackers Through Rapid Methods and Its Comparison to Descriptive Panel Data

Despite the continued growth of the gluten-free food market, there is a dearth of sensory and consumer knowledge on commercial products. The existing research is mostly limited to hedonic measurements and ingredient effects instead of analytical methods for a better understanding of product characteristics of gluten-free crackers specifically. In this work, a semi-trained consumer panel used projective mapping to choose objectively different plain/original crackers from a pool of sixteen commercial gluten-free cracker varieties. The cracker samples represented a widespread sensory space originating from different key ingredients such as brown rice, white rice, flaxseed, cassava flour, nut flour blend, millet blend, and tapioca/potato starch blend. Based on projective mapping results, the crackers that mostly represented the sensory space were selected for characterization by a modified flash profiling method. The consumer panel developed 74 descriptors: 30 aromas, 28 flavors, 15 texture terms, and a mouthfeel attribute. The samples were monadically rated for intensity on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = low, 2 = medium, and 3 = high). Rice, toasted, salt, grain, burnt, flaxseed, bitter, earthy, nutty, seeds, and grass were the prevalent aromas and flavors. Others were specific to cracker type. Some of these attributes can be traced back to the ingredients list. Results suggest that ingredients used in small portions are defining the flavor properties over the major grains/flour blends. All samples had some degree of crunchiness, crispness, and pasty mouthfeel; rice crackers were particularly firm, hard, and chewy; brown rice crackers were gritty; crackers with tuber starches/flours were more airy, soft, smooth, and flaky. Overall, the samples shared more aroma and flavor notes than texture attributes. In comparison to trained panel results, consumers generated a greater number of terms and were successful in finding subtle differences primarily in texture but had many overlapped flavors. The developed consumer terminology will facilitate the gluten-free industry to tailor communication that better resonates with consumer experiences, needs, and product values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172972
Primary Topic
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Characterization of Commercial Gluten-Free Crackers Through Rapid Methods and Its Comparison to Descriptive Panel Data

Jaswinder Kaur Brar, Martin Talavera, Rajesh Kumar
2 links
Foods
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
article

Consumer Characterization of Commercial Gluten-Free Crackers Through Rapid Methods and Its Comparison to Descriptive Panel Data

Jaswinder Kaur Brar, Martin Talavera, Rajesh Kumar
article en

Abstract

Despite the continued growth of the gluten-free food market, there is a dearth of sensory and consumer knowledge on commercial products. The existing research is mostly limited to hedonic measurements and ingredient effects instead of analytical methods for a better understanding of product characteristics of gluten-free crackers specifically. In this work, a semi-trained consumer panel used projective mapping to choose objectively different plain/original crackers from a pool of sixteen commercial gluten-free cracker varieties. The cracker samples represented a widespread sensory space originating from different key ingredients such as brown rice, white rice, flaxseed, cassava flour, nut flour blend, millet blend, and tapioca/potato starch blend. Based on projective mapping results, the crackers that mostly represented the sensory space were selected for characterization by a modified flash profiling method. The consumer panel developed 74 descriptors: 30 aromas, 28 flavors, 15 texture terms, and a mouthfeel attribute. The samples were monadically rated for intensity on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = low, 2 = medium, and 3 = high). Rice, toasted, salt, grain, burnt, flaxseed, bitter, earthy, nutty, seeds, and grass were the prevalent aromas and flavors. Others were specific to cracker type. Some of these attributes can be traced back to the ingredients list. Results suggest that ingredients used in small portions are defining the flavor properties over the major grains/flour blends. All samples had some degree of crunchiness, crispness, and pasty mouthfeel; rice crackers were particularly firm, hard, and chewy; brown rice crackers were gritty; crackers with tuber starches/flours were more airy, soft, smooth, and flaky. Overall, the samples shared more aroma and flavor notes than texture attributes. In comparison to trained panel results, consumers generated a greater number of terms and were successful in finding subtle differences primarily in texture but had many overlapped flavors. The developed consumer terminology will facilitate the gluten-free industry to tailor communication that better resonates with consumer experiences, needs, and product values.

FoodsVol. 14(17)
Kansas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.