In silico and in vitro studies of gemcitabine derivatives as anticancer agents

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death globally and is expected to increase in incidence. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the anticancer efficacy of gemcitabine derivatives on MCF7, A549, and PC3 cell lines. Compounds Com. 10 and Com. 16 were the most potent, with IC₅₀ values of 9.45, 6.93, and 12.09 µM (Com. 10) and 12.23, 6.60, and 21.57 µM (Com. 16) for the three cell lines, showing a better response compared to the reference drug gemcitabine. Com. 9 and Com. 14 were also moderately active, preferentially on A549 and PC3. Com. 16 showed strong binding with the active residues as determined by molecular docking. Com. 16 bound to key cancer targets Vav1 (6NEW), ERK2 (4ZXT), and CYP3A4 (7LXL), with docking scores of −191.72, −187.66, and −221.08 kcal/mol, respectively. These interactions were electrostatic, hydrophobic, and π-type, similar to those induced by gemcitabine. Several other compounds also demonstrated good docking scores (−160 to −180 kcal/mol), and eight protein–ligand complexes emerged as leads. Moreover, ADME and physicochemical analyses of the top six active compounds indicated good drug-likeness and a favorable PK profile compared to gemcitabine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacia
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.72.e153719
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In silico and in vitro studies of gemcitabine derivatives as anticancer agents

Ali Jabbar Radhi, Ihsan Alrubaie, Mahmood M. Fahad, Kinza Afzal et al.
1 citations
Pharmacia
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
1.52
article

In silico and in vitro studies of gemcitabine derivatives as anticancer agents

Ali Jabbar Radhi, Ihsan Alrubaie, Mahmood M. Fahad, Kinza Afzal, Nusrat Shafig
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death globally and is expected to increase in incidence. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the anticancer efficacy of gemcitabine derivatives on MCF7, A549, and PC3 cell lines. Compounds Com. 10 and Com. 16 were the most potent, with IC₅₀ values of 9.45, 6.93, and 12.09 µM (Com. 10) and 12.23, 6.60, and 21.57 µM (Com. 16) for the three cell lines, showing a better response compared to the reference drug gemcitabine. Com. 9 and Com. 14 were also moderately active, preferentially on A549 and PC3. Com. 16 showed strong binding with the active residues as determined by molecular docking. Com. 16 bound to key cancer targets Vav1 (6NEW), ERK2 (4ZXT), and CYP3A4 (7LXL), with docking scores of −191.72, −187.66, and −221.08 kcal/mol, respectively. These interactions were electrostatic, hydrophobic, and π-type, similar to those induced by gemcitabine. Several other compounds also demonstrated good docking scores (−160 to −180 kcal/mol), and eight protein–ligand complexes emerged as leads. Moreover, ADME and physicochemical analyses of the top six active compounds indicated good drug-likeness and a favorable PK profile compared to gemcitabine.

PharmaciaVol. 72
University of Alkafeel (IQ), Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University (IQ), Government College Women University Faisalabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In silico and in vitro studies of gemcitabine derivatives as anticancer agents — Ali Jabbar Radhi, Ihsan Alrubaie, et al. · Pharmacia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS