Sharing emissions and removals for meeting the Paris Agreement through a distributive and corrective justice lens

Abstract Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is critical for achieving net-zero and net-negative CO 2 emissions that can halt and potentially reverse global warming, respectively. However, reliable CDR is still costly and comes with considerable technological and ecological uncertainties. Despite the centrality of equity in the Paris Agreement, no integrated framework exists to equitably allocate responsibilities for CDR and residual emissions among countries. Here, we present a justice-based framework that separates out ethical considerations for equitably allocating gross emissions and gross CDR, addressing how these contributions shift before and after reaching global net-zero CO 2 emissions. The framework distinguishes between CDR delivered as a common good to reach a collective global climate outcome, and CDR that is used to pay off carbon debts due to emissions overconsumption. We offer a new perspective for how nations with substantial historical responsibilities and emerging economies with increasing capacities can collaborate and equitably share the CDR burden, enhancing both international cooperation and national-level climate action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adff2e
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sharing emissions and removals for meeting the Paris Agreement through a distributive and corrective justice lens

Mingyu Li, Joeri Rogelj, Rui Wang, Xuan Zheng et al.
3 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
article

Sharing emissions and removals for meeting the Paris Agreement through a distributive and corrective justice lens

Mingyu Li, Joeri Rogelj, Rui Wang, Xuan Zheng, Can Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is critical for achieving net-zero and net-negative CO 2 emissions that can halt and potentially reverse global warming, respectively. However, reliable CDR is still costly and comes with considerable technological and ecological uncertainties. Despite the centrality of equity in the Paris Agreement, no integrated framework exists to equitably allocate responsibilities for CDR and residual emissions among countries. Here, we present a justice-based framework that separates out ethical considerations for equitably allocating gross emissions and gross CDR, addressing how these contributions shift before and after reaching global net-zero CO 2 emissions. The framework distinguishes between CDR delivered as a common good to reach a collective global climate outcome, and CDR that is used to pay off carbon debts due to emissions overconsumption. We offer a new perspective for how nations with substantial historical responsibilities and emerging economies with increasing capacities can collaborate and equitably share the CDR burden, enhancing both international cooperation and national-level climate action.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(10)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), State Council of the People's Republic of China (CN), Imperial College London (GB), Tsinghua University (CN)
European Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.