Ranking-based sanctions for retraction-afflicted elite researchers

We discuss the findings and their implications for addressing retractions among elite researchers, as well as strategies for refining the ranking-based sanction framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accountability in Research
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2549008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ranking-based sanctions for retraction-afflicted elite researchers

Shaoxiong Brian Xu, Guangwei Hu
2 citations
Accountability in Research
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
article

Ranking-based sanctions for retraction-afflicted elite researchers

Shaoxiong Brian Xu, Guangwei Hu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We discuss the findings and their implications for addressing retractions among elite researchers, as well as strategies for refining the ranking-based sanction framework.

Accountability in ResearchVol. 33(4)
Huanggang Normal University (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Huanggang Normal University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.