Machine-learning-based prediction of cut quality parameters of plasma arc cutting

Stainless Steel 304 is known for its excellent mechanical properties; however, it is difficult to machine using conventional methods. Plasma arc cutting, a non-conventional machining technique, offers an efficient alternative; however, the quality of the cut is highly sensitive to process parameters. In this study, a design-of-experiment-based Central Composite Design was used to design experiments and analyze the effects of key input parameters such as Current, Cutting Speed and Pressure on cut quality indicators such as Kerf Width and Heat-Affected Zone. The experimental data were further utilized to train and evaluate machine learning regression models, including Linear Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Adaptive Boosting. Pearson's Correlation Heatmap was employed to validate the relationships between input parameters and response variables. Comparative analysis showed that the Gradient Boosting model provided the most accurate predictions, closely matching the experimental results for both the Kerf Width and Heat-Affected Zone. Specifically, the Gradient Boosting model achieved R 2 values of 0.983 for the Kerf Width and 0.968 for the Heat-Affected Zone. In contrast, the traditional model based on Response Surface Methodology yielded lower R 2 values of 0.878 for the Kerf Width and 0.886 for the Heat-Affected Zone. These results clearly indicate that the machine learning models, particularly Gradient Boosting Regression, outperform the traditional statistical model based on Response Surface Methodology in terms of accuracy and prediction efficiency for plasma arc cutting of Stainless Steel 304.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089251370603
Primary Topic
Advanced machining processes and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine-learning-based prediction of cut quality parameters of plasma arc cutting

Pankaj Sawdatkar, Vinod Parmar, Dilpreet Singh
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Advanced machining processes and optimization
article

Machine-learning-based prediction of cut quality parameters of plasma arc cutting

Pankaj Sawdatkar, Vinod Parmar, Dilpreet Singh
article en

Abstract

Stainless Steel 304 is known for its excellent mechanical properties; however, it is difficult to machine using conventional methods. Plasma arc cutting, a non-conventional machining technique, offers an efficient alternative; however, the quality of the cut is highly sensitive to process parameters. In this study, a design-of-experiment-based Central Composite Design was used to design experiments and analyze the effects of key input parameters such as Current, Cutting Speed and Pressure on cut quality indicators such as Kerf Width and Heat-Affected Zone. The experimental data were further utilized to train and evaluate machine learning regression models, including Linear Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Adaptive Boosting. Pearson's Correlation Heatmap was employed to validate the relationships between input parameters and response variables. Comparative analysis showed that the Gradient Boosting model provided the most accurate predictions, closely matching the experimental results for both the Kerf Width and Heat-Affected Zone. Specifically, the Gradient Boosting model achieved R 2 values of 0.983 for the Kerf Width and 0.968 for the Heat-Affected Zone. In contrast, the traditional model based on Response Surface Methodology yielded lower R 2 values of 0.878 for the Kerf Width and 0.886 for the Heat-Affected Zone. These results clearly indicate that the machine learning models, particularly Gradient Boosting Regression, outperform the traditional statistical model based on Response Surface Methodology in terms of accuracy and prediction efficiency for plasma arc cutting of Stainless Steel 304.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (IN), Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced machining processes and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.