On Fact-Checking Service: Artificial Intelligence’s Uses in Ibero-American Fact-Checkers

To fight disinformation, fact-checking initiatives have used artificial intelligence tools as part of the investigation process, whether to monitor false narratives, to assist in the construction of content, or to allocate verifications more effectively. In this theoretical and empirical study, in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives of four fact-checking organizations: Polígrafo (Portugal), Chequeado (Argentina), Maldita (Spain), and Aletheia (Brazil). Our aim was to find out how they use AI in the fact-checking process, and it was concluded that each organization uses these technologies to respond to specific needs. This is why different levels of use were identified, from tooling (simple) to disruptive (advanced), which are related to their human structure and economic situation. The most developed Ibero-American organizations are on a par with their global counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14090514
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Fact-Checking Service: Artificial Intelligence’s Uses in Ibero-American Fact-Checkers

João Canavilhas, Liliane de Lucena Ito
1 citations
Social Sciences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

On Fact-Checking Service: Artificial Intelligence’s Uses in Ibero-American Fact-Checkers

João Canavilhas, Liliane de Lucena Ito
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To fight disinformation, fact-checking initiatives have used artificial intelligence tools as part of the investigation process, whether to monitor false narratives, to assist in the construction of content, or to allocate verifications more effectively. In this theoretical and empirical study, in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives of four fact-checking organizations: Polígrafo (Portugal), Chequeado (Argentina), Maldita (Spain), and Aletheia (Brazil). Our aim was to find out how they use AI in the fact-checking process, and it was concluded that each organization uses these technologies to respond to specific needs. This is why different levels of use were identified, from tooling (simple) to disruptive (advanced), which are related to their human structure and economic situation. The most developed Ibero-American organizations are on a par with their global counterparts.

Social SciencesVol. 14(9)
University of Beira Interior (PT), Institute of Physics (AZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Fact-Checking Service: Artificial Intelligence’s Uses in Ibero-American Fact-Checkers — João Canavilhas, Liliane de Lucena Ito · Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS