Family health teams facing suicidal behavior: quantitative cross-sectional study

Abstract Objective To analyze sociodemographic and occupational variables about the attitudes of Family Health Teams toward patients with suicidal behavior. Methods This quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted in a city of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The following instruments were used to collect data: Sociodemographic and occupational form and the Suicide Behavior Attitude Questionnaire. Data collection was performed from February to June 2023 with the participation of 235 professionals. Analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression. Results Low professional capacity for patient care, few negative feelings, and few moralistic attitudes (global averages: 4.99, 3.82, and 6.16, respectively) were observed. In the bivariate analysis of the global averages, the variables education (p=0.005) and age group (p=0.049) were significant. In the multivariate analysis, age group (p≤0.001) and education level (p=0.012) were confirmed as predictors of outcomes and should be further investigated concerning attitudes. Conclusion The attitudes of professionals in family health teams can be influenced by personal characteristics. Professionals aged >42 years showed more negative feelings toward patients and suicide rights. Having a religion was associated with conceptions about the right to suicide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Paulista de Enfermagem
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2025ao001714i
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family health teams facing suicidal behavior: quantitative cross-sectional study

Lúcia Aparecida Ferreira, Fernanda Araújo de Paula Delfino, Luiza Elena Casaburi, Marli Aparecida Reis Coimbra et al.
Acta Paulista de Enfermagem
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Family health teams facing suicidal behavior: quantitative cross-sectional study

Lúcia Aparecida Ferreira, Fernanda Araújo de Paula Delfino, Luiza Elena Casaburi, Marli Aparecida Reis Coimbra, Maria Aline Leocádio, Fabiana Augusta Moreira Lopes, Fernanda Bonato Zuffi, P. Ferreira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To analyze sociodemographic and occupational variables about the attitudes of Family Health Teams toward patients with suicidal behavior. Methods This quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted in a city of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The following instruments were used to collect data: Sociodemographic and occupational form and the Suicide Behavior Attitude Questionnaire. Data collection was performed from February to June 2023 with the participation of 235 professionals. Analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression. Results Low professional capacity for patient care, few negative feelings, and few moralistic attitudes (global averages: 4.99, 3.82, and 6.16, respectively) were observed. In the bivariate analysis of the global averages, the variables education (p=0.005) and age group (p=0.049) were significant. In the multivariate analysis, age group (p≤0.001) and education level (p=0.012) were confirmed as predictors of outcomes and should be further investigated concerning attitudes. Conclusion The attitudes of professionals in family health teams can be influenced by personal characteristics. Professionals aged >42 years showed more negative feelings toward patients and suicide rights. Having a religion was associated with conceptions about the right to suicide.

Acta Paulista de EnfermagemVol. 38
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Brasil (BR), Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (BR), Universidade de Uberaba (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.