The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection

In standard investigative interviews, follow-up questioning from a free recall is typically based on the core topics of the free recall that are relevant to the event under investigation. We suggest the Segmented Interview as an alternative in which each free recall topic is partitioned into segments, and focused questioning occurs for each topic and segment separately, regardless of their relevance to the event under investigation. We expected the focused questioning of the Segmented Interview to elicit more details and Veracity cues than a Structured Interview. All participants (<i>N</i> = 80) completed three activities, of which only the second was different: Truth tellers visited a store, whereas lie tellers stole an envelope with money. Participants were then interviewed and provided a free recall, followed by open questions based on the Segmented or Structured Interview protocol. The Segmented Interview elicited more information and Veracity cues than the Structured Interview. These results suggest that the Segmented Interview may be a promising interview technique for eliciting information and detecting lies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091163
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection

Mariasavina Severino, Haneen Deeb, Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij
Behavioral Sciences
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection

Mariasavina Severino, Haneen Deeb, Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij
article en

Abstract

In standard investigative interviews, follow-up questioning from a free recall is typically based on the core topics of the free recall that are relevant to the event under investigation. We suggest the Segmented Interview as an alternative in which each free recall topic is partitioned into segments, and focused questioning occurs for each topic and segment separately, regardless of their relevance to the event under investigation. We expected the focused questioning of the Segmented Interview to elicit more details and Veracity cues than a Structured Interview. All participants (<i>N</i> = 80) completed three activities, of which only the second was different: Truth tellers visited a store, whereas lie tellers stole an envelope with money. Participants were then interviewed and provided a free recall, followed by open questions based on the Segmented or Structured Interview protocol. The Segmented Interview elicited more information and Veracity cues than the Structured Interview. These results suggest that the Segmented Interview may be a promising interview technique for eliciting information and detecting lies.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(9)
Los Angeles Police Department (US), University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.