Quantum computing for discrete optimization: A highlight of three technologies

Quantum optimization has emerged as a promising frontier of quantum computing, providing novel numerical approaches to mathematical optimization problems. The main goal of this paper is to facilitate interdisciplinary research between the Operations Research (OR) and quantum computing communities by helping OR scientists to build initial intuition for-, and offering them a hands-on gateway to quantum-powered methods in the context of discrete optimization. To this end, we consider three quantum-powered optimization approaches that make use of different types of quantum hardware available on the market. To illustrate these approaches, we solve three classical optimization problems: the Traveling Salesperson Problem, Weighted Maximum Cut, and Maximum Independent Set. With a general OR audience in mind, we attempt to provide an intuition behind each approach along with key references, describe the corresponding high-level workflow, and highlight crucial practical considerations. In particular, we emphasize the importance of problem formulations and device-specific configurations, and their impact on the amount of resources required for computation (where we focus on the number of qubits). These points are illustrated with a series of experiments on three types of quantum computers: a neutral atom machine from QuEra , a quantum annealer from D-Wave , and gate-based devices from IBM . • We compare three quantum optimization methods on distinct quantum devices. • A unified workflow illustrates modeling, configuration, and solution steps. • We quantify dependence of qubit requirements on formulation, algorithm, and device. • Experiments apply three quantum devices to classical discrete optimization problems. • Encoding problems on quantum hardware can require significant computational overhead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Operational Research
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.063
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum computing for discrete optimization: A highlight of three technologies

Alexey Bochkarev, Raoul Heese, Philine Schiewe, Sven Jäger et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Operational Research
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
7.44
article

Quantum computing for discrete optimization: A highlight of three technologies

Alexey Bochkarev, Raoul Heese, Philine Schiewe, Sven Jäger, Anita Schöbel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Quantum optimization has emerged as a promising frontier of quantum computing, providing novel numerical approaches to mathematical optimization problems. The main goal of this paper is to facilitate interdisciplinary research between the Operations Research (OR) and quantum computing communities by helping OR scientists to build initial intuition for-, and offering them a hands-on gateway to quantum-powered methods in the context of discrete optimization. To this end, we consider three quantum-powered optimization approaches that make use of different types of quantum hardware available on the market. To illustrate these approaches, we solve three classical optimization problems: the Traveling Salesperson Problem, Weighted Maximum Cut, and Maximum Independent Set. With a general OR audience in mind, we attempt to provide an intuition behind each approach along with key references, describe the corresponding high-level workflow, and highlight crucial practical considerations. In particular, we emphasize the importance of problem formulations and device-specific configurations, and their impact on the amount of resources required for computation (where we focus on the number of qubits). These points are illustrated with a series of experiments on three types of quantum computers: a neutral atom machine from QuEra , a quantum annealer from D-Wave , and gate-based devices from IBM . • We compare three quantum optimization methods on distinct quantum devices. • A unified workflow illustrates modeling, configuration, and solution steps. • We quantify dependence of qubit requirements on formulation, algorithm, and device. • Experiments apply three quantum devices to classical discrete optimization problems. • Encoding problems on quantum hardware can require significant computational overhead.

European Journal of Operational ResearchVol. 329(3)
University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics (DE), Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau (DE), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.