Cognition and Social Cognition in People Experiencing Homelessness

Objective: To understand the social cognitive profile of a population of people experiencing homelessness. To identify to what extent social cognition and other cognitive functions were related in the present sample. Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed to recruit thirty-five English speaking participants, who completed a battery of tests of cognition and social cognition. Social cognition measures included the Affect Naming Task, Mentalisation Stories, and the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Results: Participant performance on objective measures of social cognition (Affect Naming, Mentalisation Stories) were poorer than expected based on normative data. A number of weaknesses on cognitive tasks assessing verbal learning and memory and attentional-executive functions were identified. Cognitive functions in other domains correlated with but was not predictive of social cognition performance. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify weaknesses in social cognition in a sample of people experiencing homelessness without veteran status. People who are homeless should be routinely offered assessment of their cognition and social cognition, in order to better support their health and housing needs. Future research with more diverse samples and longitudinal follow-up will strengthen our understanding of social cognition in people who are homeless.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Homelessness
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/ijoh.2023.3.21839
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognition and Social Cognition in People Experiencing Homelessness

Matthew H. Jones‐Chesters, Hannah Reene
International Journal on Homelessness
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

Cognition and Social Cognition in People Experiencing Homelessness

Matthew H. Jones‐Chesters, Hannah Reene
article en

Abstract

Objective: To understand the social cognitive profile of a population of people experiencing homelessness. To identify to what extent social cognition and other cognitive functions were related in the present sample. Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed to recruit thirty-five English speaking participants, who completed a battery of tests of cognition and social cognition. Social cognition measures included the Affect Naming Task, Mentalisation Stories, and the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Results: Participant performance on objective measures of social cognition (Affect Naming, Mentalisation Stories) were poorer than expected based on normative data. A number of weaknesses on cognitive tasks assessing verbal learning and memory and attentional-executive functions were identified. Cognitive functions in other domains correlated with but was not predictive of social cognition performance. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify weaknesses in social cognition in a sample of people experiencing homelessness without veteran status. People who are homeless should be routinely offered assessment of their cognition and social cognition, in order to better support their health and housing needs. Future research with more diverse samples and longitudinal follow-up will strengthen our understanding of social cognition in people who are homeless.

International Journal on Homelessness
University of East London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.