Fast chiral resolution with optimal control

In this work, we formulate the problem of achieving in minimum time perfect chiral resolution with bounded control fields as an optimal control problem on two noninteracting spins $1/2$. We assume the same control bound for the two Raman fields (pump and Stokes) and a different bound for the field directly connecting the two lower-energy states. Using control theory, we show that the optimal fields can only take the boundary values or be zero, with the latter corresponding to singular control. Subsequently, using numerical optimal control and intuitive arguments, we identify some three-stage symmetric optimal pulse sequences for relatively large values of the ratio between the two control bounds and analytically calculate the corresponding pulse timings as a function of this ratio. For smaller values of the bound ratio, numerical optimal control indicates that the optimal pulse sequence loses its symmetry and the number of stages increases in general. In all cases, the analytical or numerical optimal protocol achieves a faster perfect chiral resolution than other pulsed protocols, mainly because of the simultaneous action of the control fields. The present work is expected to be useful in the wide spectrum of applications across the natural sciences in which enantiomer separation is a crucial task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/fkmb-b4k4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast chiral resolution with optimal control

Dionisis Stefanatos, Ioannis Thanopulos, Emmanuel Paspalakis
1 citations
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
1.25
article

Fast chiral resolution with optimal control

Dionisis Stefanatos, Ioannis Thanopulos, Emmanuel Paspalakis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this work, we formulate the problem of achieving in minimum time perfect chiral resolution with bounded control fields as an optimal control problem on two noninteracting spins $1/2$. We assume the same control bound for the two Raman fields (pump and Stokes) and a different bound for the field directly connecting the two lower-energy states. Using control theory, we show that the optimal fields can only take the boundary values or be zero, with the latter corresponding to singular control. Subsequently, using numerical optimal control and intuitive arguments, we identify some three-stage symmetric optimal pulse sequences for relatively large values of the ratio between the two control bounds and analytically calculate the corresponding pulse timings as a function of this ratio. For smaller values of the bound ratio, numerical optimal control indicates that the optimal pulse sequence loses its symmetry and the number of stages increases in general. In all cases, the analytical or numerical optimal protocol achieves a faster perfect chiral resolution than other pulsed protocols, mainly because of the simultaneous action of the control fields. The present work is expected to be useful in the wide spectrum of applications across the natural sciences in which enantiomer separation is a crucial task.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 112(2)
University of Patras (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fast chiral resolution with optimal control — Dionisis Stefanatos, Ioannis Thanopulos, et al. · Physical review. A/Physical review, A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS