Political affiliation or need for cognition? It depends on the post: Comparing key factors related to detecting health disinformation in the U.S.

We investigate why people believe disinformation about health-related issues. Acting on disinformation could lead to severe injuries and even death. Five hundred eight American respondents each reviewed 10 different social media posts about health-related topics, and 60% of the posts contained disinformation. They were asked to evaluate the posts for their honesty and explain their decisions. Respondents successfully detected disinformation about 2/3 of the time. Across all participant responses, need for cognition was the only factor important to successful detection of disinformation. When investigating each social media post individually, need for cognition was key for 35% of the posts, while political affiliation was key for 15%. Neither factor was important for the remaining 50% of posts. People with a high need for cognition were adept at detecting online disinformation, but those with conservative political affiliations were not. Those best suited to detecting health-related disinformation either had a high need for cognition or a liberal political affiliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315259
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political affiliation or need for cognition? It depends on the post: Comparing key factors related to detecting health disinformation in the U.S.

Joey F. George
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Political affiliation or need for cognition? It depends on the post: Comparing key factors related to detecting health disinformation in the U.S.

Joey F. George
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate why people believe disinformation about health-related issues. Acting on disinformation could lead to severe injuries and even death. Five hundred eight American respondents each reviewed 10 different social media posts about health-related topics, and 60% of the posts contained disinformation. They were asked to evaluate the posts for their honesty and explain their decisions. Respondents successfully detected disinformation about 2/3 of the time. Across all participant responses, need for cognition was the only factor important to successful detection of disinformation. When investigating each social media post individually, need for cognition was key for 35% of the posts, while political affiliation was key for 15%. Neither factor was important for the remaining 50% of posts. People with a high need for cognition were adept at detecting online disinformation, but those with conservative political affiliations were not. Those best suited to detecting health-related disinformation either had a high need for cognition or a liberal political affiliation.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Political affiliation or need for cognition? It depends on the post: Comparing key factors related to detecting health disinformation in the U.S. — Joey F. George · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS