Driving Resilience: Assessing Security Incidents’ Criticality in Autonomous Vehicles

Despite advancements in security methodologies, modern vehicular systems still struggle to assess the criticality and resilience of security incidents. This work presents a framework that uses classification and clustering to evaluate the criticality of attacks in automotive systems, which enables dynamic, run-time assessment and prioritization based on asset impact and threat characteristics for informed decision-making during incident response. Our methodology assesses security incident criticality through a two-phase framework. The Offline Phase involves data collection, mapping asset-threat relationships, feature engineering, and model training using multi-label classification and clustering. The Online Phase evaluates incidents in real-time by classifying security goals, clustering threats, and considering asset criticality. Results demonstrate 0.94 accuracy in classifying affected security goals, while clustering yields 16 attack clusters. The final decision-making process achieves 0.92 accuracy, highlighting resilience, robustness, adaptability, and support for real-time incident management, while processing criticality assessments in 13 ms, which ensures applicability in automotive cybersecurity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/csr64739.2025.11130054
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving Resilience: Assessing Security Incidents’ Criticality in Autonomous Vehicles

Stefan Katzenbeisser, Yaman Qendah
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Driving Resilience: Assessing Security Incidents’ Criticality in Autonomous Vehicles

Stefan Katzenbeisser, Yaman Qendah
article en

Abstract

Despite advancements in security methodologies, modern vehicular systems still struggle to assess the criticality and resilience of security incidents. This work presents a framework that uses classification and clustering to evaluate the criticality of attacks in automotive systems, which enables dynamic, run-time assessment and prioritization based on asset impact and threat characteristics for informed decision-making during incident response. Our methodology assesses security incident criticality through a two-phase framework. The Offline Phase involves data collection, mapping asset-threat relationships, feature engineering, and model training using multi-label classification and clustering. The Online Phase evaluates incidents in real-time by classifying security goals, clustering threats, and considering asset criticality. Results demonstrate 0.94 accuracy in classifying affected security goals, while clustering yields 16 attack clusters. The final decision-making process achieves 0.92 accuracy, highlighting resilience, robustness, adaptability, and support for real-time incident management, while processing criticality assessments in 13 ms, which ensures applicability in automotive cybersecurity.

University of Passau (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Driving Resilience: Assessing Security Incidents’ Criticality in Autonomous Vehicles — Stefan Katzenbeisser, Yaman Qendah · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS