A Proactive Framework for Identifying At-Risk Affordable Housing in High-Pressure Markets

A wave of expiring Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) contracts threatens the U.S. affordable housing stock. Existing preservation tools are reactive and calendar-based, providing little insight into where risk is most severe or why. We introduce a proactive diagnostic framework to identify at-risk properties using a multidimensional Vulnerability Score that quantifies risk by combining an owner’s financial motive (the rent gap) with market opportunity (low vacancy and high cost burden). Analyzing 2,805 census tracts, we identify three statistically distinct risk tiers: Low Risk, Medium Risk (emerging risk), and High Risk. Risk is not monolithic but has distinct drivers, with the highest vulnerability concentrated in gentrifying, racially diverse neighborhoods. The highest concentration of for-profit ownership occurs in Medium Risk neighborhoods with high poverty rates, creating conditions where displacement pressures build in advance of contract expiration decisions. This method equips planners with a replicable, evidence-based tool to strategically target interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Findings
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.143619
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Proactive Framework for Identifying At-Risk Affordable Housing in High-Pressure Markets

Nischal Subedi
Findings
Housing Market and Economics
article

A Proactive Framework for Identifying At-Risk Affordable Housing in High-Pressure Markets

Nischal Subedi
article en

Abstract

A wave of expiring Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) contracts threatens the U.S. affordable housing stock. Existing preservation tools are reactive and calendar-based, providing little insight into where risk is most severe or why. We introduce a proactive diagnostic framework to identify at-risk properties using a multidimensional Vulnerability Score that quantifies risk by combining an owner’s financial motive (the rent gap) with market opportunity (low vacancy and high cost burden). Analyzing 2,805 census tracts, we identify three statistically distinct risk tiers: Low Risk, Medium Risk (emerging risk), and High Risk. Risk is not monolithic but has distinct drivers, with the highest vulnerability concentrated in gentrifying, racially diverse neighborhoods. The highest concentration of for-profit ownership occurs in Medium Risk neighborhoods with high poverty rates, creating conditions where displacement pressures build in advance of contract expiration decisions. This method equips planners with a replicable, evidence-based tool to strategically target interventions.

Findings
University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.