SPECIALIZED INSTITUTIONS IMPLEMENTING HISTORICAL POLICY (THE CASE OF UKRAINE, POLAND AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC)

The article unveils and defines the activities of specialized bodies that implement historical policy in Ukraine, Poland, and the Czech Republic, and also identifies their common and distinctive features.It demonstrates the key role of these institutions in shaping historical memory in post-communist societies.The research was conducted using comparative, historical-chronological, and descriptive methods, applying analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction, which allowed for a deep and comprehensive analysis.The source base consists of official documents and legislative acts of the mentioned countries, ensuring the reliability of the presented data.A detailed analysis of the functioning of these institutions was carried out based on several main indicators: the process of formation, structure, funding, activities, and criticism.It was found that the process of forming memory institutions was directly determined by each state's unique historical path and its approach to overcoming the totalitarian past.For example, in Poland, the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) was created promptly, indicating a high level of public consensus regarding the re-evaluation of the Soviet occupation.In Ukraine and the Czech Republic, however, where there was no such clear and unambiguous distancing from the communist legacy, the relevant bodies appeared later and had less influence on political life.The Polish IPN plays a significant role in public life, not only carrying out educational activities but also conducting lustration processes and investigating crimes against the Polish people, with systemic state financial support.The Ukrainian Institute of National Memory changed its role from a purely research institution to a more active actor in historical policy after the events of Euromaidan and Russian aggression, which underscores the dynamism of its development.In contrast, the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes in the Czech Republic traditionally remains a research body.The study focuses on criticism, as all these memory institutions are characterized by a high degree of politicization, which inevitably affects their work and causes debates regarding the objectivity and interpretation of historical events.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific notes of Taurida National V I Vernadsky University series Historical Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-5984.2025/2.34
Primary Topic
Central European and Russian historical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SPECIALIZED INSTITUTIONS IMPLEMENTING HISTORICAL POLICY (THE CASE OF UKRAINE, POLAND AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC)

V. V. Anisimov
Scientific notes of Taurida National V I Vernadsky University series Historical Sciences
Central European and Russian historical studies
article

SPECIALIZED INSTITUTIONS IMPLEMENTING HISTORICAL POLICY (THE CASE OF UKRAINE, POLAND AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC)

V. V. Anisimov
article en

Abstract

The article unveils and defines the activities of specialized bodies that implement historical policy in Ukraine, Poland, and the Czech Republic, and also identifies their common and distinctive features.It demonstrates the key role of these institutions in shaping historical memory in post-communist societies.The research was conducted using comparative, historical-chronological, and descriptive methods, applying analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction, which allowed for a deep and comprehensive analysis.The source base consists of official documents and legislative acts of the mentioned countries, ensuring the reliability of the presented data.A detailed analysis of the functioning of these institutions was carried out based on several main indicators: the process of formation, structure, funding, activities, and criticism.It was found that the process of forming memory institutions was directly determined by each state's unique historical path and its approach to overcoming the totalitarian past.For example, in Poland, the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) was created promptly, indicating a high level of public consensus regarding the re-evaluation of the Soviet occupation.In Ukraine and the Czech Republic, however, where there was no such clear and unambiguous distancing from the communist legacy, the relevant bodies appeared later and had less influence on political life.The Polish IPN plays a significant role in public life, not only carrying out educational activities but also conducting lustration processes and investigating crimes against the Polish people, with systemic state financial support.The Ukrainian Institute of National Memory changed its role from a purely research institution to a more active actor in historical policy after the events of Euromaidan and Russian aggression, which underscores the dynamism of its development.In contrast, the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes in the Czech Republic traditionally remains a research body.The study focuses on criticism, as all these memory institutions are characterized by a high degree of politicization, which inevitably affects their work and causes debates regarding the objectivity and interpretation of historical events.

Scientific notes of Taurida National V I Vernadsky University series Historical Sciences(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Central European and Russian historical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.