Hybrid modeling for streamflow prediction in ungauged rivers with uncertainty quantification: a comparative analysis

ABSTRACT Streamflow predictions are essential for flood risk prevention and long-term water resource management. Extensive research has been dedicated to forecasting river discharge for gauged rivers, where discharge data is readily available. However, accurately predicting discharge in ungauged rivers continues to pose a substantial challenge. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) offer opportunities to develop and refine predictive models for ungauged rivers. This study addresses two key limitations of existing ML models: the exclusion of sensitive physical features and overconfidence in predictions. By integrating principles of mass conservation and robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods, we aim to enhance the reliability of ML-based streamflow forecasts. We propose a hybrid modeling approach that leverages insights from calibrated physics-based river-routing models, considers the causal effects of carefully selected features, and integrates UQ methods to obtain probabilistic discharge predictions in ungauged rivers. Three different UQ methods within the ML models are investigated. The results of a Colorado River upper basin demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods (i.e., purely data-driven method), reducing the prediction error by about 40% and offering credible uncertainty bounds for risk-informed decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2025.011
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid modeling for streamflow prediction in ungauged rivers with uncertainty quantification: a comparative analysis

Guga Gugaratshan, Sarah Miele, Mayank Chadha, Michael D. Todd et al.
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Hybrid modeling for streamflow prediction in ungauged rivers with uncertainty quantification: a comparative analysis

Guga Gugaratshan, Sarah Miele, Mayank Chadha, Michael D. Todd, Yichao Zeng, C. McKnight, Zhen Yu Hu, Zhao Zhao, Natalie P. Memarsadeghi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Streamflow predictions are essential for flood risk prevention and long-term water resource management. Extensive research has been dedicated to forecasting river discharge for gauged rivers, where discharge data is readily available. However, accurately predicting discharge in ungauged rivers continues to pose a substantial challenge. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) offer opportunities to develop and refine predictive models for ungauged rivers. This study addresses two key limitations of existing ML models: the exclusion of sensitive physical features and overconfidence in predictions. By integrating principles of mass conservation and robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods, we aim to enhance the reliability of ML-based streamflow forecasts. We propose a hybrid modeling approach that leverages insights from calibrated physics-based river-routing models, considers the causal effects of carefully selected features, and integrates UQ methods to obtain probabilistic discharge predictions in ungauged rivers. Three different UQ methods within the ML models are investigated. The results of a Colorado River upper basin demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods (i.e., purely data-driven method), reducing the prediction error by about 40% and offering credible uncertainty bounds for risk-informed decision making.

Journal of Hydroinformatics
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (GB), University of California San Diego (US), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.