Blood pressure management in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction

The management of blood pressure (BP) in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a matter of debate. Since no dedicated trials have specifically addressed BP control in patients recovering from an acute coronary syndrome, there are no evidence-based, prospective data to define precise BP targets in this population. Moreover, major international guidelines devote surprisingly little attention to BP management in the post-AMI setting, despite its recognized importance in reducing recurrent cardiovascular events. On one hand, BP-lowering may improve cardiac function by reducing afterload and myocardial oxygen consumption and by facilitating favourable ventricular remodelling. On the other hand, the concept of a J-shaped association-whereby excessive lowering of diastolic blood pressure may paradoxically increase cardiovascular risk, particularly in the early post-AMI period-remains a matter of ongoing uncertainty. Despite decades of investigation, this issue has not been definitively resolved and continues to raise debate within both the scientific community and among clinicians. In this review, we examine the current evidence supporting BP control in the context of secondary prevention following AMI, with an updated focus on the ongoing debate surrounding the potential implications of the J-shaped phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular Research
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaf145
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood pressure management in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction

Bryan Williams, Franz H. Messerli, Giovanna Gallo, Massimo Volpe et al.
2 citations
Cardiovascular Research
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
2.78
article

Blood pressure management in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction

Bryan Williams, Franz H. Messerli, Giovanna Gallo, Massimo Volpe, Tomasz J Guzik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The management of blood pressure (BP) in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a matter of debate. Since no dedicated trials have specifically addressed BP control in patients recovering from an acute coronary syndrome, there are no evidence-based, prospective data to define precise BP targets in this population. Moreover, major international guidelines devote surprisingly little attention to BP management in the post-AMI setting, despite its recognized importance in reducing recurrent cardiovascular events. On one hand, BP-lowering may improve cardiac function by reducing afterload and myocardial oxygen consumption and by facilitating favourable ventricular remodelling. On the other hand, the concept of a J-shaped association-whereby excessive lowering of diastolic blood pressure may paradoxically increase cardiovascular risk, particularly in the early post-AMI period-remains a matter of ongoing uncertainty. Despite decades of investigation, this issue has not been definitively resolved and continues to raise debate within both the scientific community and among clinicians. In this review, we examine the current evidence supporting BP control in the context of secondary prevention following AMI, with an updated focus on the ongoing debate surrounding the potential implications of the J-shaped phenomenon.

Cardiovascular ResearchVol. 121(13)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), CTO Andrea Alesini (IT), Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH), Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University College London (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.