You Can’t Cheer That: NCAA Division I FBS Stadium Speech Policies and the First Amendment

Fan behavior at college sporting events has long been a concern for administrators. Particularly, fan speech—including inappropriate signs, vulgar cheers, and rude images on clothing—has proven difficult for policymakers to address. Yet, as previous scholarship has demonstrated, speech policies at public university spaces intending to curtail such behavior frequently violate the First Amendment protections of students and spectators (see, e.g., Calvert & Richards, 2004; Ulian, 2016). Using a comparative analysis of speech policies published on the athletic department websites for every public university in the Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), we determined that 94 of the 102 evaluated institutions had speech codes for one or more of their sports facilities that could be used to violate the First Amendment rights of spectators. We discuss the implications of such policies for potential litigation against universities and offer recommendations for crafting better policies for fan behavior at university athletic events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18060/29179
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You Can’t Cheer That: NCAA Division I FBS Stadium Speech Policies and the First Amendment

Neal Ternes, Monyae Williamson-Gourley
Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport
Legal Issues in Education
article

You Can’t Cheer That: NCAA Division I FBS Stadium Speech Policies and the First Amendment

Neal Ternes, Monyae Williamson-Gourley
article en

Abstract

Fan behavior at college sporting events has long been a concern for administrators. Particularly, fan speech—including inappropriate signs, vulgar cheers, and rude images on clothing—has proven difficult for policymakers to address. Yet, as previous scholarship has demonstrated, speech policies at public university spaces intending to curtail such behavior frequently violate the First Amendment protections of students and spectators (see, e.g., Calvert & Richards, 2004; Ulian, 2016). Using a comparative analysis of speech policies published on the athletic department websites for every public university in the Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), we determined that 94 of the 102 evaluated institutions had speech codes for one or more of their sports facilities that could be used to violate the First Amendment rights of spectators. We discuss the implications of such policies for potential litigation against universities and offer recommendations for crafting better policies for fan behavior at university athletic events.

Journal of Legal Aspects of SportVol. 35(2)
Northern Illinois University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Legal Issues in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

You Can’t Cheer That: NCAA Division I FBS Stadium Speech Policies and the First Amendment — Neal Ternes, Monyae Williamson-Gourley · Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS