Tumor‐agnostic detection of circulating tumor <scp>DNA</scp> in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer using targeted <scp>DNA</scp> methylation sequencing and cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> fragmentomics

We investigated whether DNA methylation and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation patterns can improve circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in advanced pancreatic cancer. In a cohort of 33 patients, ctDNA detection was performed in a tumor-agnostic fashion using DNA methylation, cfDNA fragment lengths, and 4-mer 5' end motifs. Machine learning models estimating ctDNA levels were built for each individual detection method and their combination. All models significantly differentiated ctDNA levels in patients from healthy individuals (P < 0.001). Using the highest estimated levels in healthy volunteers as cutoffs, ctDNA was detected in 79%, 67%, 67%, and 55% of patients using methylation, fragment length, end motifs, and the combined model, respectively. Univariable Cox regression showed that all ctDNA level estimates were associated with increased hazard ratios (HR, all P < 0.001) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed ctDNA levels as an independent predictor of PFS (HR = 1.9, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 2.7, P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that machine learning models based on DNA methylation, cfDNA fragment lengths, and cfDNA end motifs can estimate ctDNA levels and predict clinical outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Oncology
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70116
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tumor‐agnostic detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer using targeted DNA methylation sequencing and cell‐free DNA fragmentomics

Oddmund Nordgård, Filip Janku, Satu Oltedal, Morten Lapin et al.
Molecular Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Tumor‐agnostic detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer using targeted DNA methylation sequencing and cell‐free DNA fragmentomics

Oddmund Nordgård, Filip Janku, Satu Oltedal, Morten Lapin, Kjersti Tjensvoll, Trygve Eftestøl, Herish Garresori, Bjørnar Gilje, Karin H. Edland, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Saga Ekedal
article en

Abstract

We investigated whether DNA methylation and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation patterns can improve circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in advanced pancreatic cancer. In a cohort of 33 patients, ctDNA detection was performed in a tumor-agnostic fashion using DNA methylation, cfDNA fragment lengths, and 4-mer 5' end motifs. Machine learning models estimating ctDNA levels were built for each individual detection method and their combination. All models significantly differentiated ctDNA levels in patients from healthy individuals (P < 0.001). Using the highest estimated levels in healthy volunteers as cutoffs, ctDNA was detected in 79%, 67%, 67%, and 55% of patients using methylation, fragment length, end motifs, and the combined model, respectively. Univariable Cox regression showed that all ctDNA level estimates were associated with increased hazard ratios (HR, all P < 0.001) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed ctDNA levels as an independent predictor of PFS (HR = 1.9, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 2.7, P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that machine learning models based on DNA methylation, cfDNA fragment lengths, and cfDNA end motifs can estimate ctDNA levels and predict clinical outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Molecular OncologyVol. 19(12)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Stavanger University Hospital (NO), University of Stavanger (NO)
Kreftforeningen, Helse Vest
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.