CTOD Evaluation Using ASTM 1820 and BS 7448

Crack Tip Opening Displacement ( CTOD or δ ) is used as a fracture toughness parameter in ASTM 1820 and BS 7448. The critical CTOD is estimated in these standards through distinct concepts and also resulting in varied magnitudes. Here, the comparison between CTOD estimation standards ASTM 1820 and BS 7448 is carried out for AA2050-T84 alloy. Firstly, the CTOD as per ASTM 1820 is estimated for Compact Tension (CT), Disc-Shaped Compact Tension (DCT), and Single Edge Notch Bend (SENB) by varying yield stress to ultimate stress ( S yt /S ut ) and crack length to width of the specimen ( a/W ). The constraint parameter ( m ) equations used to relate J -integral ( J ) and CTOD were modified to first order polynomials. The error of less than 1% between third order (recommended in ASTM 1820) and first order polynomial equations ensured the accuracy of the newly proposed equations. Further, the CTOD were estimated by both ASTM 1820 and BS 7448 for various S yt /S ut using experimental results of AA2050-T84 alloy made CT specimen. The CTOD estimated from BS 7448 were almost four times higher compared to ASTM 1820. Finally, author recommends the necessity of reliable J - CTOD relationship among the standards, to popularize the CTOD as a fracture toughness parameter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Structural Integrity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.08.009
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTOD Evaluation Using ASTM 1820 and BS 7448

Nagaraj Ekabote
4 links
Procedia Structural Integrity
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

CTOD Evaluation Using ASTM 1820 and BS 7448

Nagaraj Ekabote
article en

Abstract

Crack Tip Opening Displacement ( CTOD or δ ) is used as a fracture toughness parameter in ASTM 1820 and BS 7448. The critical CTOD is estimated in these standards through distinct concepts and also resulting in varied magnitudes. Here, the comparison between CTOD estimation standards ASTM 1820 and BS 7448 is carried out for AA2050-T84 alloy. Firstly, the CTOD as per ASTM 1820 is estimated for Compact Tension (CT), Disc-Shaped Compact Tension (DCT), and Single Edge Notch Bend (SENB) by varying yield stress to ultimate stress ( S yt /S ut ) and crack length to width of the specimen ( a/W ). The constraint parameter ( m ) equations used to relate J -integral ( J ) and CTOD were modified to first order polynomials. The error of less than 1% between third order (recommended in ASTM 1820) and first order polynomial equations ensured the accuracy of the newly proposed equations. Further, the CTOD were estimated by both ASTM 1820 and BS 7448 for various S yt /S ut using experimental results of AA2050-T84 alloy made CT specimen. The CTOD estimated from BS 7448 were almost four times higher compared to ASTM 1820. Finally, author recommends the necessity of reliable J - CTOD relationship among the standards, to popularize the CTOD as a fracture toughness parameter.

Procedia Structural IntegrityVol. 71
KLE Technological University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CTOD Evaluation Using ASTM 1820 and BS 7448 — Nagaraj Ekabote · Procedia Structural Integrity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS