Data or content? The conceptual battles defining dataset markets

Foundation models are a new frontier of value creation in the digital platform economy. These technologies rely on the production and consumption of massive datasets that are monetised through consumer facing artificial intelligence (AI) products. However, the unlicensed use of these materials by the AI industry has provoked a legal and conceptual dispute. Media industries claim that the material in datasets is ‘content’ and subject to copyright law. AI industries, alternatively, are working to strategically reframe those materials as ‘data’, which is governed through regimes more congenial to the industry's business models, such as loosely enforced data protection and technologically secured trade secrets. This essay shows how AI copyright litigation, and the central question of data versus content, is mediating between different claims to the right to generate and justify value from datasets, as well as participating in the broader reformation of AI dataset markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Platforms & Society
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624251365617
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data or content? The conceptual battles defining dataset markets

Jake Goldenfein
Platforms & Society
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Data or content? The conceptual battles defining dataset markets

Jake Goldenfein
article en

Abstract

Foundation models are a new frontier of value creation in the digital platform economy. These technologies rely on the production and consumption of massive datasets that are monetised through consumer facing artificial intelligence (AI) products. However, the unlicensed use of these materials by the AI industry has provoked a legal and conceptual dispute. Media industries claim that the material in datasets is ‘content’ and subject to copyright law. AI industries, alternatively, are working to strategically reframe those materials as ‘data’, which is governed through regimes more congenial to the industry's business models, such as loosely enforced data protection and technologically secured trade secrets. This essay shows how AI copyright litigation, and the central question of data versus content, is mediating between different claims to the right to generate and justify value from datasets, as well as participating in the broader reformation of AI dataset markets.

Platforms & SocietyVol. 2
Melbourne School of Theology (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (AU), Applied Decision Science (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.