Comparative Assessment of Deflections of Voided Reinforced Concrete Slabs, FEM Analysis and Manual Calculations

This article presents a comprehensive comparative study of deflection voided reinforced concrete slabs, evaluating the results obtained through Finite Element Method (FEM) analyses of various accuracy and manual calculations, specifically employing the method of strips. Distinct methodologies used for analysis are: FEM analysis using SCIA Engineer, where voids in the slab are accounted for by adjusting the modulus of elasticity and self - weight of concrete. The slab is modelled by using 2D slab elements, allowing for efficient and relatively fast examination of structural behaviour and FEM analysis in ANSYS Workbench Mechanical, where voids are modelled within a 3D solid representation of the entire slab. This approach should provide the best representation of a real structure as it models all its elements with their respective physical attributes. Results of FEM analyses would be compared not only to each other, but also with results of manual calculations, if possible. Calculations that are going to be used are based on the method of strips, a traditional approach for analysing deflection of reinforced concrete slabs. The comparative analysis encompasses calculations of deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs with various geometrical properties and boundary conditions. The findings aim to contribute to the engineering community by elucidating the strengths, limitations, and trade - offs associated with each respective type of FEM analysis, as well as manual calculations, when it comes to assessing the deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Inżynieria Mineralna
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29227/im-2024-02-03
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Deflections of Voided Reinforced Concrete Slabs, FEM Analysis and Manual Calculations

Daniel Beutelhauser, Norbert Jendželovský
4 links
Inżynieria Mineralna
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Comparative Assessment of Deflections of Voided Reinforced Concrete Slabs, FEM Analysis and Manual Calculations

Daniel Beutelhauser, Norbert Jendželovský
article en

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive comparative study of deflection voided reinforced concrete slabs, evaluating the results obtained through Finite Element Method (FEM) analyses of various accuracy and manual calculations, specifically employing the method of strips. Distinct methodologies used for analysis are: FEM analysis using SCIA Engineer, where voids in the slab are accounted for by adjusting the modulus of elasticity and self - weight of concrete. The slab is modelled by using 2D slab elements, allowing for efficient and relatively fast examination of structural behaviour and FEM analysis in ANSYS Workbench Mechanical, where voids are modelled within a 3D solid representation of the entire slab. This approach should provide the best representation of a real structure as it models all its elements with their respective physical attributes. Results of FEM analyses would be compared not only to each other, but also with results of manual calculations, if possible. Calculations that are going to be used are based on the method of strips, a traditional approach for analysing deflection of reinforced concrete slabs. The comparative analysis encompasses calculations of deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs with various geometrical properties and boundary conditions. The findings aim to contribute to the engineering community by elucidating the strengths, limitations, and trade - offs associated with each respective type of FEM analysis, as well as manual calculations, when it comes to assessing the deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs.

Inżynieria MineralnaVol. 1(2)
Kultúrna a Edukacná Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR, Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.