Politicising agricultural transformation through farmer groups’ everyday collective practices

Farmer collectives, such as farmer groups, play a crucial role in advancing struggles for inclusive and sustainable rural development. Yet their potential to influence agricultural policies and practices remains undervalued. Drawing on focus group discussions with farmer groups in northern Uganda, we examine how their routine collective practices function as critical mechanisms for cultivating viable but often overlooked social, economic, and ecological alternatives. These groups create structures for contesting dominant agrarian ideologies and arenas for advancing smallholder-friendly agricultural practices. Using the theoretical lens of everyday forms of politics, our analysis shows how farmer-led activities such as community seed banks, farmer field schools, and village savings and loan associations reflect both resistance to neoliberal paradigms that favour market-driven growth, and aspirations for alternative agrarian futures centered on social equity and ecological sustainability. The latter materializes in advancing agricultural visions that are more socially just, economically inclusive, and ecologically resilient. Although we frame these actions as subtle expressions of political agency, they clearly embody latent potential to catalyze more explicit forms of politicisation within agricultural transformation. However, continued reliance on external actors, particularly non-governmental organisations, risks eroding the long-term autonomy and sustainability of these initiatives. Enhancing internal leadership and grassroots capacity is therefore critical to securing the self-determination and resilience of farmer-led efforts. • Farmer groups are vital arenas for building rural agency and transformation. • Farmer-led strategies advance locally grounded alternatives to top-down modernization. • Grassroots collective practices form the foundation of transformative agricultural development. • Everyday collective practices shape agricultural transformation in rural Uganda. • Everyday practices hold latent potential for politicizing agricultural transformation. • Routine everyday practices foster resilience, autonomy, and social cohesion

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103859
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politicising agricultural transformation through farmer groups’ everyday collective practices

Ronald Byaruhanga, Sinem Kavak, Ellinor Isgren
4 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
19.33
article

Politicising agricultural transformation through farmer groups’ everyday collective practices

Ronald Byaruhanga, Sinem Kavak, Ellinor Isgren
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Farmer collectives, such as farmer groups, play a crucial role in advancing struggles for inclusive and sustainable rural development. Yet their potential to influence agricultural policies and practices remains undervalued. Drawing on focus group discussions with farmer groups in northern Uganda, we examine how their routine collective practices function as critical mechanisms for cultivating viable but often overlooked social, economic, and ecological alternatives. These groups create structures for contesting dominant agrarian ideologies and arenas for advancing smallholder-friendly agricultural practices. Using the theoretical lens of everyday forms of politics, our analysis shows how farmer-led activities such as community seed banks, farmer field schools, and village savings and loan associations reflect both resistance to neoliberal paradigms that favour market-driven growth, and aspirations for alternative agrarian futures centered on social equity and ecological sustainability. The latter materializes in advancing agricultural visions that are more socially just, economically inclusive, and ecologically resilient. Although we frame these actions as subtle expressions of political agency, they clearly embody latent potential to catalyze more explicit forms of politicisation within agricultural transformation. However, continued reliance on external actors, particularly non-governmental organisations, risks eroding the long-term autonomy and sustainability of these initiatives. Enhancing internal leadership and grassroots capacity is therefore critical to securing the self-determination and resilience of farmer-led efforts. • Farmer groups are vital arenas for building rural agency and transformation. • Farmer-led strategies advance locally grounded alternatives to top-down modernization. • Grassroots collective practices form the foundation of transformative agricultural development. • Everyday collective practices shape agricultural transformation in rural Uganda. • Everyday practices hold latent potential for politicizing agricultural transformation. • Routine everyday practices foster resilience, autonomy, and social cohesion

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 120
Lund University (SE), Göteborgs Stads (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
19.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.