Assessing the impact of building geometry detail levels on the accuracy of calibrated urban building energy models

Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM) has become an essential tool for analysis and planning renovation strategies as well as predicting future energy use patterns both at building and district levels. To aid urban planning effectively, digital solutions such as UBEM should support informed urban planning decisions by analysing various renovation scenarios, including energy use, occupant comfort, and climate resilience, while ensuring accuracy without excessive complexity. A critical input for physics-based UBEM tools is building geometry, which can be represented at different levels of detail (LoD). Striking a balance between accuracy and the costs and time required for data generation necessitates examining the influence of LoD in building geometry. This research aims to investigate the extent to which the LoD in building geometry can influence the accuracy of results. To achieve this, four LoD of building geometry were defined for 9 different detached single-family houses in Sweden, and their effect on model performance was assessed with and without calibration using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) algorithm. The calibration used simulated heating demand and utility bill data, optimising for Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CVRMSE) and Normalised Mean Bias Error (NMBE) indices. The results indicate that, without calibration, models with differing geometric LoDs can exhibit significant performance discrepancies, with variations of up to 19.7% in the CVRMSE and 22.5% in NMBE observed between high and low geometric detail levels. However with calibration, the differences between models with varying geometric LoDs were substantially reduced, with average CVRMSE and NMBE decreasing to 2.9% and 0.9%, respectively, well within ASHRAE Guideline thresholds. The findings offer useful guidance for academic and societal stakeholders working to improve energy modeling in urban planning. By identifying effective LoDs and calibration methods, this research enables cost-efficient UBEM applications, supporting better decisions for sustainable urban development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116339
Primary Topic
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of building geometry detail levels on the accuracy of calibrated urban building energy models

Brijesh Mainali, Migena Sula, Amin Moazami, Krushna Mahapatra et al.
Energy and Buildings
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
article

Assessing the impact of building geometry detail levels on the accuracy of calibrated urban building energy models

Brijesh Mainali, Migena Sula, Amin Moazami, Krushna Mahapatra, Ahmad Mazaheri
article en

Abstract

Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM) has become an essential tool for analysis and planning renovation strategies as well as predicting future energy use patterns both at building and district levels. To aid urban planning effectively, digital solutions such as UBEM should support informed urban planning decisions by analysing various renovation scenarios, including energy use, occupant comfort, and climate resilience, while ensuring accuracy without excessive complexity. A critical input for physics-based UBEM tools is building geometry, which can be represented at different levels of detail (LoD). Striking a balance between accuracy and the costs and time required for data generation necessitates examining the influence of LoD in building geometry. This research aims to investigate the extent to which the LoD in building geometry can influence the accuracy of results. To achieve this, four LoD of building geometry were defined for 9 different detached single-family houses in Sweden, and their effect on model performance was assessed with and without calibration using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) algorithm. The calibration used simulated heating demand and utility bill data, optimising for Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CVRMSE) and Normalised Mean Bias Error (NMBE) indices. The results indicate that, without calibration, models with differing geometric LoDs can exhibit significant performance discrepancies, with variations of up to 19.7% in the CVRMSE and 22.5% in NMBE observed between high and low geometric detail levels. However with calibration, the differences between models with varying geometric LoDs were substantially reduced, with average CVRMSE and NMBE decreasing to 2.9% and 0.9%, respectively, well within ASHRAE Guideline thresholds. The findings offer useful guidance for academic and societal stakeholders working to improve energy modeling in urban planning. By identifying effective LoDs and calibration methods, this research enables cost-efficient UBEM applications, supporting better decisions for sustainable urban development.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 347
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.