Impact of industrial waste fillers in self-compacting mortars: A comparative analysis of mechanical performance

This study investigates the viability of utilizing non-biodegradable industrial waste streams specifically ground glass, crushed brick, and sanitary ceramics as alternative fillers in self-compacting mortars (SCMs). A conventional SCM mixture incorporating traditional limestone filler served as the control benchmark. The research assessed the influence of substituting conventional fillers with waste- derived materials, varying their proportions while maintaining a constant cement content. The experimental results showed that the inclusion of alternative fillers enabled the target slump flow values to be achieved with a lower water-cement ratio, thus reducing water demand. However, the mortars with brick and ceramic fillers had longer mini-V- funnel flow times. Analysis of the hydration heat revealed that brick and ceramic fillers accelerated early hydration reactions, whereas glass fillers exhibited a delayed reactivity. Mortars containing these alternative fillers showed significant mechanical strength increases over time; compressive strength and dynamic modulus of elasticity increased significantly. After 365 days of curing, compressive strength values increased by 34% and 37% for mortars containing brick and ceramic fillers, respectively, and by 31% for those incorporating glass fillers, relative to the control mortar. These findings highlight the promising potential of valorizing industrial waste materials as efficient, economical, and environmentally sustainable alternatives to conventional limestone fillers in SCMs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2025-978me0718rs
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of industrial waste fillers in self-compacting mortars: A comparative analysis of mechanical performance

Ramdane Chihaoui, Mehdi Seghiri, Ahmed Soufiane Benosman, Y. Senhadji et al.
4 links
Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Impact of industrial waste fillers in self-compacting mortars: A comparative analysis of mechanical performance

Ramdane Chihaoui, Mehdi Seghiri, Ahmed Soufiane Benosman, Y. Senhadji, Karim Belmokretar, Mohamed Mouli, Ahmed Messaoud Djebara
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the viability of utilizing non-biodegradable industrial waste streams specifically ground glass, crushed brick, and sanitary ceramics as alternative fillers in self-compacting mortars (SCMs). A conventional SCM mixture incorporating traditional limestone filler served as the control benchmark. The research assessed the influence of substituting conventional fillers with waste- derived materials, varying their proportions while maintaining a constant cement content. The experimental results showed that the inclusion of alternative fillers enabled the target slump flow values to be achieved with a lower water-cement ratio, thus reducing water demand. However, the mortars with brick and ceramic fillers had longer mini-V- funnel flow times. Analysis of the hydration heat revealed that brick and ceramic fillers accelerated early hydration reactions, whereas glass fillers exhibited a delayed reactivity. Mortars containing these alternative fillers showed significant mechanical strength increases over time; compressive strength and dynamic modulus of elasticity increased significantly. After 365 days of curing, compressive strength values increased by 34% and 37% for mortars containing brick and ceramic fillers, respectively, and by 31% for those incorporating glass fillers, relative to the control mortar. These findings highlight the promising potential of valorizing industrial waste materials as efficient, economical, and environmentally sustainable alternatives to conventional limestone fillers in SCMs.

Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.