Decoding corporate climate transition plans: A comparative analysis of 14 frameworks

In response to growing environmental pressures, companies are increasingly required to develop comprehensive climate transition plans aligned with their science-based targets. However, a harmonized definition for these transition plans is lacking across existing frameworks, and effective corporate disclosure is still limited. This study examines 14 prominent frameworks for corporate climate transition, identifying key components that define transition plans and analysing how disclosure requirements shape expectations for corporate decarbonization. Despite variations in emphasis, granularity, and audience, the analysis finds strong convergence on core elements of transition planning. By translating over 1400 individual disclosure requests into 13 components and 38 sub-components, the study shows how frameworks increasingly demand that companies link decarbonization strategies to business planning, financial alignment, and governance structures. These findings clarify what companies are asked to disclose, offer insights to help them navigate diverse frameworks, and highlight areas where further guidance and capacity building can be found. The study contributes to academic and policy debates on implementing credible, actionable transition plans, offering insights for framework developers and regulators aiming to balance ambition with practical implementation. It also calls for further research to support companies in developing robust transition plans, ultimately advancing their contribution to global climate goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127062
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding corporate climate transition plans: A comparative analysis of 14 frameworks

Daniela C. A. Pigosso, Anders Bjørn, Tim C. McAloone, Astrid Birk Nicolajsen
Journal of Environmental Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Decoding corporate climate transition plans: A comparative analysis of 14 frameworks

Daniela C. A. Pigosso, Anders Bjørn, Tim C. McAloone, Astrid Birk Nicolajsen
article en

Abstract

In response to growing environmental pressures, companies are increasingly required to develop comprehensive climate transition plans aligned with their science-based targets. However, a harmonized definition for these transition plans is lacking across existing frameworks, and effective corporate disclosure is still limited. This study examines 14 prominent frameworks for corporate climate transition, identifying key components that define transition plans and analysing how disclosure requirements shape expectations for corporate decarbonization. Despite variations in emphasis, granularity, and audience, the analysis finds strong convergence on core elements of transition planning. By translating over 1400 individual disclosure requests into 13 components and 38 sub-components, the study shows how frameworks increasingly demand that companies link decarbonization strategies to business planning, financial alignment, and governance structures. These findings clarify what companies are asked to disclose, offer insights to help them navigate diverse frameworks, and highlight areas where further guidance and capacity building can be found. The study contributes to academic and policy debates on implementing credible, actionable transition plans, offering insights for framework developers and regulators aiming to balance ambition with practical implementation. It also calls for further research to support companies in developing robust transition plans, ultimately advancing their contribution to global climate goals.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 393
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.