Research on Functional Alienation of Bookmarking Behavior among Xiaohongshu Users in the Context of Digital Hoarding

This study focuses on the "bookmarking as action" behavioral paradox on the Xiaohongshu platform, a phenomenon exhibiting characteristics of mild digital hoarding. Addressing limitations in existing research—such as the pathologizing bias towards digital hoarding, insufficient attention to emotional mechanisms, and the neglect of platform design roles—this research introduces the theoretical framework of "functional alienation" to explore how user bookmarking behavior shifts from a functional practice of "enabling future action" to an emotional practice of "alleviating immediate anxiety." By integrating theories of digital hoarding, emotion, and meaning-making, a "meaning-emotion-behavior-alienation" cyclical model is constructed. A mixed-method approach combining questionnaire screening and in-depth interviews is employed to analyze user motivations and contradictions. Findings reveal that users rationalize bookmarking through meaning narratives such as "knowledge management" and "identity marking"; platform designs like "one-click bookmarking + algorithmic recommendation + digital feedback" collude with emotional logic to foster continuous hoarding; behavioral alienation leads to functional failure and emotional burden, forming a paradox of substitutive satisfaction where "bookmarking equates to possession." The conclusion unveils the mechanism of behavioral alienation driven by the mutual construction of platform capital logic and user emotion, providing theoretical expansion for research on digital hoarding in social media.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/y43t1y44
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Functional Alienation of Bookmarking Behavior among Xiaohongshu Users in the Context of Digital Hoarding

Yue Wu
Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
Medical Research and Treatments
article

Research on Functional Alienation of Bookmarking Behavior among Xiaohongshu Users in the Context of Digital Hoarding

Yue Wu
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on the "bookmarking as action" behavioral paradox on the Xiaohongshu platform, a phenomenon exhibiting characteristics of mild digital hoarding. Addressing limitations in existing research—such as the pathologizing bias towards digital hoarding, insufficient attention to emotional mechanisms, and the neglect of platform design roles—this research introduces the theoretical framework of "functional alienation" to explore how user bookmarking behavior shifts from a functional practice of "enabling future action" to an emotional practice of "alleviating immediate anxiety." By integrating theories of digital hoarding, emotion, and meaning-making, a "meaning-emotion-behavior-alienation" cyclical model is constructed. A mixed-method approach combining questionnaire screening and in-depth interviews is employed to analyze user motivations and contradictions. Findings reveal that users rationalize bookmarking through meaning narratives such as "knowledge management" and "identity marking"; platform designs like "one-click bookmarking + algorithmic recommendation + digital feedback" collude with emotional logic to foster continuous hoarding; behavioral alienation leads to functional failure and emotional burden, forming a paradox of substitutive satisfaction where "bookmarking equates to possession." The conclusion unveils the mechanism of behavioral alienation driven by the mutual construction of platform capital logic and user emotion, providing theoretical expansion for research on digital hoarding in social media.

Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication StudiesVol. 1(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Medical Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.