Raising the Roof of the World: Intra‐Crustal Asian Mantle Supports the Himalayan‐Tibetan Orogen

Abstract The Himalayan‐Tibetan orogen formed via the ongoing collision of India and Asia. Its colossal elevations stem from buoyant crustal roots that doubled in thickness during continental collision, widely believed to result from Indian crust under‐thrusting its Asian counterpart and Asian crustal thickening. However, a single crustal layer of up to ∼70–80 km thickness conflicts with experimental‐rheological and observational constraints, especially if related to the vertical juxtaposition of Indian and Asian crusts. For instance, crustal thickness above ∼40 km implies reduced strength of the continental lithosphere, which may become unable to sustain a plateau the size of Tibet throughout much of the Cenozoic. In addition, the geochemistry and association of ultramafic xenoliths and K‐rich magmas from Southern Tibet indicates the presence of mantle material between ∼50 and 80 km depths. The mechanisms controlling the rise and persistence of Earth's highest orogen, therefore, remain enigmatic. Here, new fully‐coupled numerical petrological‐thermomechanical geodynamic models reconcile the wealth of available structural and petrological constraints through viscous underplating of Indian crust beneath Asian lithosphere, which together supply buoyancy and strength to raise and support the Himalayas and Tibet. We further convert our geodynamic models into receiver functions and shear waves velocity maps that match, to a first order, the available geophysical data from the Himalayas and southern Tibet. We propose that viscous underplating of Indian crust beneath Asian lithosphere, not crust, forms the overall architecture of the Himalayan‐Tibetan orogen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tectonics
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025tc009057
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raising the Roof of the World: Intra‐Crustal Asian Mantle Supports the Himalayan‐Tibetan Orogen

Rosario Esposito, Eduardo Garzanti, Armel Menant, Siavash Ghelichkhan et al.
1 citations
Tectonics
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
1.87
article

Raising the Roof of the World: Intra‐Crustal Asian Mantle Supports the Himalayan‐Tibetan Orogen

Rosario Esposito, Eduardo Garzanti, Armel Menant, Siavash Ghelichkhan, Sierd A.P.L. Cloetingh, Taras Gerya, Pietro Sternai, D. Rhodri Davies, Pierre Bouilhol, Bram Vaes, Simone Pilia, Léa Ostorero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Himalayan‐Tibetan orogen formed via the ongoing collision of India and Asia. Its colossal elevations stem from buoyant crustal roots that doubled in thickness during continental collision, widely believed to result from Indian crust under‐thrusting its Asian counterpart and Asian crustal thickening. However, a single crustal layer of up to ∼70–80 km thickness conflicts with experimental‐rheological and observational constraints, especially if related to the vertical juxtaposition of Indian and Asian crusts. For instance, crustal thickness above ∼40 km implies reduced strength of the continental lithosphere, which may become unable to sustain a plateau the size of Tibet throughout much of the Cenozoic. In addition, the geochemistry and association of ultramafic xenoliths and K‐rich magmas from Southern Tibet indicates the presence of mantle material between ∼50 and 80 km depths. The mechanisms controlling the rise and persistence of Earth's highest orogen, therefore, remain enigmatic. Here, new fully‐coupled numerical petrological‐thermomechanical geodynamic models reconcile the wealth of available structural and petrological constraints through viscous underplating of Indian crust beneath Asian lithosphere, which together supply buoyancy and strength to raise and support the Himalayas and Tibet. We further convert our geodynamic models into receiver functions and shear waves velocity maps that match, to a first order, the available geophysical data from the Himalayas and southern Tibet. We propose that viscous underplating of Indian crust beneath Asian lithosphere, not crust, forms the overall architecture of the Himalayan‐Tibetan orogen.

TectonicsVol. 44(9)
Australian National University (AU), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Utrecht University (NL), ETH Zurich (CH), Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques (FR), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Fondazione Cariplo
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.