Avoiding 21st-Century Eugenics: Gene Editing, Posthumanism, and Conscientious Innovation

Emerging biotechnologies in the 21st century such as CRISPR gene editing have brought great potential for improving human health and treating fatal diseases. However, these technologies have also triggered profound ethical controversies and human rights challenges. By reviewing the 2018 He Jiankui incident and comparing it with earlier, less controversial experiments, this article analyzes the transformation of social concepts and the lag in ethical frameworks. The discussion extends to the broader posthumanist technological wave, emphasizing concerns about exacerbating inequality if genetic enhancements become routine, which echoes eugenics in history. This essay argues that technological progress should not come at the expense of human rights, and calls for a global pause in gene editing experiments, as well as the establishment of a global accountability system. The article finally emphasizes that humans must be guided by patience and responsibility on the road to the future, and while enjoying the benefits of science and technology, we must protect our common humanity and moral bottom lines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/cbq49187
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Avoiding 21st-Century Eugenics: Gene Editing, Posthumanism, and Conscientious Innovation

Tonghui Ma
2 links
Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Avoiding 21st-Century Eugenics: Gene Editing, Posthumanism, and Conscientious Innovation

Tonghui Ma
article en

Abstract

Emerging biotechnologies in the 21st century such as CRISPR gene editing have brought great potential for improving human health and treating fatal diseases. However, these technologies have also triggered profound ethical controversies and human rights challenges. By reviewing the 2018 He Jiankui incident and comparing it with earlier, less controversial experiments, this article analyzes the transformation of social concepts and the lag in ethical frameworks. The discussion extends to the broader posthumanist technological wave, emphasizing concerns about exacerbating inequality if genetic enhancements become routine, which echoes eugenics in history. This essay argues that technological progress should not come at the expense of human rights, and calls for a global pause in gene editing experiments, as well as the establishment of a global accountability system. The article finally emphasizes that humans must be guided by patience and responsibility on the road to the future, and while enjoying the benefits of science and technology, we must protect our common humanity and moral bottom lines.

Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication StudiesVol. 1(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.