Manual annotation of Robson criteria and obstetric entities: Inter-annotator agreement and initial NER models implementation

We present a manually annotated dataset focused on Robson Criteria Classification, encompassing entities related to obstetric variables, antibiotics, uterotonics, complications, delivery outcomes, and personal information. A total of 1,865 Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were annotated, yielding 18,105 labeled entities. Inter-annotator agreement (IAA) was assessed using F1 and Kappa scores. The F1 and Kappa scores were 0.86 and 0.89 for strict criteria, respectively. For relaxed criteria, F1 and Kappa scores were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Using the annotated dataset, we trained several Named Entity Recognition (NER) models: Conditional Random Fields (CRF), fine-tuned BERT, RoBERTa, and XLM-RoBERTa models, and a zero-shot and fine-tuned Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct model. Models were evaluated under two scenarios: a 23-label scheme and a 46-label IOB scheme. The CRF model achieved the highest precision, with scores of 0.69 and 0.74 for 23 and 46 labels, respectively. RoBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa models demonstrated the best recall and F1-scores, achieving 0.70 and 0.76 for recall on 23 and 46 labels, respectively, and 0.65 and 0.72 for F1-scores on 23 and 46 labels, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110964
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manual annotation of Robson criteria and obstetric entities: Inter-annotator agreement and initial NER models implementation

Helena Gómez-Adorno, Mónica Vázquez‐Calatayud, Orlando Ramos-Flores, Reiko Ita et al.
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Topic Modeling
article

Manual annotation of Robson criteria and obstetric entities: Inter-annotator agreement and initial NER models implementation

Helena Gómez-Adorno, Mónica Vázquez‐Calatayud, Orlando Ramos-Flores, Reiko Ita, Diego-Iván Jaramillo-Sánchez, Juan-Manuel Mimiaga-Morales, Frida-Devi-Abigail Campos-Campechano, Manuel García de Quevedo-Martínez, María-Jose Aguilar-Sánchez, Marco-Antonio Ramírez-Mejía
article en

Abstract

We present a manually annotated dataset focused on Robson Criteria Classification, encompassing entities related to obstetric variables, antibiotics, uterotonics, complications, delivery outcomes, and personal information. A total of 1,865 Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were annotated, yielding 18,105 labeled entities. Inter-annotator agreement (IAA) was assessed using F1 and Kappa scores. The F1 and Kappa scores were 0.86 and 0.89 for strict criteria, respectively. For relaxed criteria, F1 and Kappa scores were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Using the annotated dataset, we trained several Named Entity Recognition (NER) models: Conditional Random Fields (CRF), fine-tuned BERT, RoBERTa, and XLM-RoBERTa models, and a zero-shot and fine-tuned Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct model. Models were evaluated under two scenarios: a 23-label scheme and a 46-label IOB scheme. The CRF model achieved the highest precision, with scores of 0.69 and 0.74 for 23 and 46 labels, respectively. RoBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa models demonstrated the best recall and F1-scores, achieving 0.70 and 0.76 for recall on 23 and 46 labels, respectively, and 0.65 and 0.72 for F1-scores on 23 and 46 labels, respectively.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 197(Pt A)
Universidad Interglobal (MX), Secretaria de Salud (MX), Universidad Panamericana (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.