Income Group Classification Case Study

Energy is the significant resources for global economic growth and development and for human daily life. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of energy and the continuous rise in energy prices have posed more severe challenges to many countries in the current international environment. Residents' energy consumption, which can be categorized into indirect consumption from production driven by consumption and direct consumption for daily living, is intricately linked to their consumption behavior. And as we know, income levels play a decisive role in shaping this consumption behavior. Different income brackets often lead to distinct energy consumption patterns; for instance, higher - income individuals might consume more energy through luxury goods production and larger living spaces, while lower - income groups focus on basic energy needs for survival and daily activities. Given this crucial connection, understanding the factors that influence income becomes paramount. This paper uses a sample size of 65,062 and applies two methods, univariate analysis and bivariate analysis, to comprehensively analyze the impacts of micro - factors such as an individual's years of education and macro - factors such as industry characteristics on personal income. A logistic regression model is constructed to predict the level of personal income based on different income - influencing factors, aiming to identify citizens with a wage level of less than $50,000 and assist the government in formulating relevant policies. The study finds that: The coefficients of some levels of education, workclass, and native country are positive. An increase in these factors will lead to an increase in the probability of a person having a salary of <= 50,000. The coefficients of age, fnlwgt, marital_status, working_hours_per_week, some levels of education, workclass, and native country are negative. An increase in these factors will lead to a decrease in the probability of a person having a salary of <= 50,000. Based on the above research results, this paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations for enhancing the income level of vulnerable groups and improving their quality of life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Finance & Economics
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/6qewyh90
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Income Group Classification Case Study

Kyung-Ah Han
Finance & Economics
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Income Group Classification Case Study

Kyung-Ah Han
article en

Abstract

Energy is the significant resources for global economic growth and development and for human daily life. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of energy and the continuous rise in energy prices have posed more severe challenges to many countries in the current international environment. Residents' energy consumption, which can be categorized into indirect consumption from production driven by consumption and direct consumption for daily living, is intricately linked to their consumption behavior. And as we know, income levels play a decisive role in shaping this consumption behavior. Different income brackets often lead to distinct energy consumption patterns; for instance, higher - income individuals might consume more energy through luxury goods production and larger living spaces, while lower - income groups focus on basic energy needs for survival and daily activities. Given this crucial connection, understanding the factors that influence income becomes paramount. This paper uses a sample size of 65,062 and applies two methods, univariate analysis and bivariate analysis, to comprehensively analyze the impacts of micro - factors such as an individual's years of education and macro - factors such as industry characteristics on personal income. A logistic regression model is constructed to predict the level of personal income based on different income - influencing factors, aiming to identify citizens with a wage level of less than $50,000 and assist the government in formulating relevant policies. The study finds that: The coefficients of some levels of education, workclass, and native country are positive. An increase in these factors will lead to an increase in the probability of a person having a salary of <= 50,000. The coefficients of age, fnlwgt, marital_status, working_hours_per_week, some levels of education, workclass, and native country are negative. An increase in these factors will lead to a decrease in the probability of a person having a salary of <= 50,000. Based on the above research results, this paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations for enhancing the income level of vulnerable groups and improving their quality of life.

Finance & EconomicsVol. 1(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Income Group Classification Case Study — Kyung-Ah Han · Finance & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS