Advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use in sustainability assessments of diets

Assessment of the sustainability of diets typically include the diet's impact on the environment, using indicators such as the carbon, water and land footprint. However, there are other crucial sustainability aspects including animal welfare and the use of antibiotics. This study contributes to the improvement of sustainability assessments of food systems by advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use, complementing traditional environmental indicators such as the carbon footprint. The proposed animal welfare indices reflect the number of animals affected per kilogram of animal product, the animals' cognitive ability to experience negative effects, and the quality of the production system, including disease frequency and space limitations. The proposed antibiotic use indicator was developed based on national sales data, adjusted for species-specific differences. These metrics were applied to a range of animal products commonly consumed in a set of European countries, revealing substantial variations in animal welfare loss and antibiotic use across species and production systems. For example, rabbit and chicken production showed high welfare loss per kilogram of meat due to the number of animals affected and the relatively poor conditions in intensive livestock systems. Meanwhile, meat from cattle and wild-caught species had lower welfare loss ( i.e. favourable) per kilogram, attributed to the larger body mass of these animals and less suffering in production. The metrics developed here offer a much needed tool for evaluating trade-offs between animal welfare, antibiotic use, and environmental sustainability in food production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use in sustainability assessments of diets

Elin Röös, L. Rydhmer
1 citations
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use in sustainability assessments of diets

Elin Röös, L. Rydhmer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Assessment of the sustainability of diets typically include the diet's impact on the environment, using indicators such as the carbon, water and land footprint. However, there are other crucial sustainability aspects including animal welfare and the use of antibiotics. This study contributes to the improvement of sustainability assessments of food systems by advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use, complementing traditional environmental indicators such as the carbon footprint. The proposed animal welfare indices reflect the number of animals affected per kilogram of animal product, the animals' cognitive ability to experience negative effects, and the quality of the production system, including disease frequency and space limitations. The proposed antibiotic use indicator was developed based on national sales data, adjusted for species-specific differences. These metrics were applied to a range of animal products commonly consumed in a set of European countries, revealing substantial variations in animal welfare loss and antibiotic use across species and production systems. For example, rabbit and chicken production showed high welfare loss per kilogram of meat due to the number of animals affected and the relatively poor conditions in intensive livestock systems. Meanwhile, meat from cattle and wild-caught species had lower welfare loss ( i.e. favourable) per kilogram, attributed to the larger body mass of these animals and less suffering in production. The metrics developed here offer a much needed tool for evaluating trade-offs between animal welfare, antibiotic use, and environmental sustainability in food production.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 59
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.