A data-driven method for identifying climate drivers of agricultural yield failure from daily weather data

Abstract. Climate-related impacts, such as agricultural yield failure, often occur in response to a range of specific weather conditions taking place across different time periods, such as during the growing season. Identifying which weather conditions and timings are most strongly associated with a certain impact is difficult because of the overwhelming number of possible predictor combinations from different aggregation periods. Here we address this challenge and introduce a method for identifying a small number of climate drivers of an impact from high-resolution meteorological data. Based on the principle that causal drivers should generalize across different environments, our proposed two-stage approach systematically generates, tests, and discards candidate features using machine learning and then generates a set of robust drivers. We evaluate the method using simulated US maize yield data from two process-based global gridded crop models and rigorous out-of-sample testing (using approximately 30 years of early 20th-century climate and yield data for training and over 70 years of subsequent data for testing). The climate drivers identified align with crop model mechanisms and consistently use only the weather variables that are taken as input by the respective models. Logistic regression models using ten drivers as predictors show strong predictive performance on the held-out test period even under shifting climatic conditions, achieving correlations of 0.70–0.85 between predicted and true annual proportions of grid cells experiencing yield failure. This approach circumvents the limitations of post-hoc interpretability in black-box machine learning models, allowing researchers to use parsimonious statistical models to explore relationships between climate and impacts, while still harnessing the predictive power of high-resolution, multivariate weather data. We demonstrate this method in the context of agricultural yield failure, but it is also applicable for studying other climate-related impacts such as forest die-off, wildfire incidents, landslides, or flooding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6687-2026
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A data-driven method for identifying climate drivers of agricultural yield failure from daily weather data

Jonas Jägermeyr, Lily‐belle Sweet, Jakob Zscheischler, Christoph Müller
Geoscientific model development
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

A data-driven method for identifying climate drivers of agricultural yield failure from daily weather data

Jonas Jägermeyr, Lily‐belle Sweet, Jakob Zscheischler, Christoph Müller
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Climate-related impacts, such as agricultural yield failure, often occur in response to a range of specific weather conditions taking place across different time periods, such as during the growing season. Identifying which weather conditions and timings are most strongly associated with a certain impact is difficult because of the overwhelming number of possible predictor combinations from different aggregation periods. Here we address this challenge and introduce a method for identifying a small number of climate drivers of an impact from high-resolution meteorological data. Based on the principle that causal drivers should generalize across different environments, our proposed two-stage approach systematically generates, tests, and discards candidate features using machine learning and then generates a set of robust drivers. We evaluate the method using simulated US maize yield data from two process-based global gridded crop models and rigorous out-of-sample testing (using approximately 30 years of early 20th-century climate and yield data for training and over 70 years of subsequent data for testing). The climate drivers identified align with crop model mechanisms and consistently use only the weather variables that are taken as input by the respective models. Logistic regression models using ten drivers as predictors show strong predictive performance on the held-out test period even under shifting climatic conditions, achieving correlations of 0.70–0.85 between predicted and true annual proportions of grid cells experiencing yield failure. This approach circumvents the limitations of post-hoc interpretability in black-box machine learning models, allowing researchers to use parsimonious statistical models to explore relationships between climate and impacts, while still harnessing the predictive power of high-resolution, multivariate weather data. We demonstrate this method in the context of agricultural yield failure, but it is also applicable for studying other climate-related impacts such as forest die-off, wildfire incidents, landslides, or flooding.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 19(14)
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE), Leibniz Association (DE), German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (DE), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Columbia University (US), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.